Gauging the Impact of Community University Engagement Initiatives in India

Abstract

Today, the world we live in is challenged with the co-existence of 'prosperity and poverty'. In India, in particular, although we are witnessing staggering increase in various economic indicators, our Human Development Indicators (HDIs) remain unenviable. It is in this context that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have assumed profound importance as having the potential to offer sustainable solutions to such societal challenges. As a result, the practice of Community University Engagement (CUE) has gained prominence, as a phenomenon seeking a two-way discourse between the communities and the universities, in an attempt to produce 'socially relevant knowledge' which is inclusive and sustainable. Considering the importance and value of such an initiative, an attempt was made to tap such engagement practices between the HEIs and communities in India. In addition to plain documentation of such engagement, another highly crucial parameter in this regard is the measurement of the impact of such initiatives, on all the stakeholders involved in the process. However, academic literature related to this is still limited. In an attempt to fill this gap, the study at hand involved impact assessment of CUE activities as an important component. Using qualitative tools of impact assessment, this paper documents the empirical evidence of the impacts on various stakeholders, arising out of CUE activities, undertaken at various universities in India. The results generated through primary data, show that although it appears to be the case of binary stakeholders (Community and University), CUE envisages engagement, integration and cross linking among a number of sub-stakeholders, getting impacted in a multitude of ways. Students get an opportunity of experiential learning; while teachers can take up socially relevant research, as part of the curriculum. Communities benefit by way of empowerment and sustainable livelihoods, while universities get a chance to project themselves as 'socially engaged' institutions. Indirect and subsidiary stakeholders like Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and Government, respectively also take away several benefits from the process. Therefore, in essence, the paper makes the case of CUE by demonstrating the positive and mutually beneficial experienced enjoyed by the stakeholders involved in the process.

Transformative Leadership Journeys: Learning and Identity of University Leaders of Engaged Scholarship

“…In the past decade we have begun to see evidence of evaluation and the availability of resources to support exemplary CES in various disciplines, or, institutionally (c.f. Driscoll, 2014;Hart & Northmore, 2010;Goodman et al, 2020;Morrison, 2020;Singh, 2017), but little on explicitly evaluating good CES leadership practices. One might extrapolate from the institutional evaluation literature, or return to researchers like Shields (2020) to compare leaders' performance to her eight principles for transformative leaders, but the field is ripe for a more empirical approach.…”

Farmer-preferred learning methods and utilised teaching approaches by Egerton University, Kenya

“…Community engagement is considered a focal universities' activity globally, in transmitting frontier knowledge to the masses (Sandmann et al, 2008;Singh, 2017;Groark and McCall, 2018). Preece (2016) argues that community engagement has its origin in the tradition of many university cultures, which share three missions: teaching, research and community service.…”

The Mediating Effect of Career Satisfaction in the Predictive Relation between Employee Engagement and Organizational Commitment of Teachers in Ghana

“…Engaged employees show a well organizational citizenship and retention attitude, commitment and satisfaction (Ugaddan & Park, 2017;Saks, 2006). Research has discovered that engaged employees are enthusiastic, energetic, motivated and passionate about their job (Singh, 2017). Since engagement is made up of behaviour and attitude (Dromey, 2014) it is expected that engaged teachers would form positive attitude to work, like to stay in their positions and work for the attainment of the goals of the various public high schools.…”

“…It is believed that the career satisfaction of workers (teachers) will increase or decrease based on the value they place on the careers of their colleagues (Eddleston, 2009). There is an urge in the business world to examine employee engagement, career satisfaction and employee commitment (Singh, 2017).…”