2022
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2072186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauging customers’ negative disconfirmation in online post-purchase behaviour: The moderating role of service recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study also reveal the important mediating role of psychological contract breach in the relationship between expectancy disconfirmation and value co-destruction in OICs. This finding provides empirical support for the open innovation ecosystem model proposed in previous studies [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] and underscores the significance of users as external innovation sources for virtual digital communities [ 42 ]. This study highlights the importance of the psychological contract between community users and enterprises, which is based on the belief that the community user will reciprocate the community’s contribution and involves the user’s belief in their own contributions and reciprocal rewards from the community.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of this study also reveal the important mediating role of psychological contract breach in the relationship between expectancy disconfirmation and value co-destruction in OICs. This finding provides empirical support for the open innovation ecosystem model proposed in previous studies [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] and underscores the significance of users as external innovation sources for virtual digital communities [ 42 ]. This study highlights the importance of the psychological contract between community users and enterprises, which is based on the belief that the community user will reciprocate the community’s contribution and involves the user’s belief in their own contributions and reciprocal rewards from the community.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The present study posits that a gap between user expectations and community innovation activities can have adverse consequences for value creation in OICs. Specifically, users who hold self-interest expectations anticipate receiving extrinsic rewards such as financial compensation, points, and honorary titles for their knowledge sharing efforts [ 40 ]. However, the enterprise may fail to deliver on the promised rewards or distribute virtual rewards that lack tangible value, leading to a misalignment between user expectations and actual rewards received, and resulting in hesitation to dedicate time and effort towards innovation activities they perceive as “futile” [ 41 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who take the entrepreneurial initiative must develop the necessary service recovery strategies to avoid failure during their entrepreneurial journeys. Therefore, future researchers should develop an integrated conceptual framework using qualitative methods to conceptualise the relationship between EE, its antecedents, and entrepreneurial service recovery strategies to overcome entrepreneurial failure (Mazhar et al , 2022; Mazhar et al , 2021). Thirdly, the roles of experiential value, value creation and value co-creation have rarely been investigated in the context of EI or EE.…”
Section: Discussion Practical Implications Agenda For Future Research...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents were informed briefly about the study design. This data collection technique is in line with Mazhar et al (2022) who have used the same study design for data collection. The respondents were further given an approximate time to complete the questionnaire, which is around 10 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is important to enhance the understanding through service recovery once there has been a service failure. Therefore, future research studies should integrate this commitment–trust-based theoretical framework with service recovery by discussing how firms should respond once there has been a trust–commitment breach, which leads to service failure (Mazhar et al , 2022, for further reference). Finally, the present study was designed on cross-sectional research design.…”
Section: Limitations and Agenda For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%