First European Congress of Mathematics Paris, July 6–10, 1992 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9328-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge Theory and Four-Manifold Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another proof is based on the construction of a flat bundle E corresponding to a homomorphism Z * K → {±1} with some cohomology group H i (X, E) of odd dimension, contradicting the extension of Hodge theory to flat rank 1 bundles (see [181] Here, the ends of a non compact topological space X are just the limit, as the compact subset K gets larger, of the connected components of the complement set X \K . It is interesting to observe that the previous result was extended by Donaldson [138] also to the case where X 1 , X 2 are simply connected smooth projective surfaces. One could believe that the combination of the two results implies tout court that the connected sum X 1 X 2 of two projective manifolds of dimension at least two cannot be homeomorphic to a projective manifold.…”
Section: (T W(m)) ∼ = π 1 (M)mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another proof is based on the construction of a flat bundle E corresponding to a homomorphism Z * K → {±1} with some cohomology group H i (X, E) of odd dimension, contradicting the extension of Hodge theory to flat rank 1 bundles (see [181] Here, the ends of a non compact topological space X are just the limit, as the compact subset K gets larger, of the connected components of the complement set X \K . It is interesting to observe that the previous result was extended by Donaldson [138] also to the case where X 1 , X 2 are simply connected smooth projective surfaces. One could believe that the combination of the two results implies tout court that the connected sum X 1 X 2 of two projective manifolds of dimension at least two cannot be homeomorphic to a projective manifold.…”
Section: (T W(m)) ∼ = π 1 (M)mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Friedman and Morgan instead made the 'speculation' that the answer to the DEF = DIFF question should be positive (1987) (see [168]), motivated by the new examples of homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic surfaces discovered by Donaldson (see [138] and [139] for a survey on this topic).…”
Section: Connected Components Of Gieseker's Moduli Spacementioning
confidence: 99%