2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219887814500169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge invariant composite fields out of connections, with examples

Abstract: In this paper we put forward a systematic and unifying approach to construct gauge invariant composite fields out of connections. It relies on the existence in the theory of a group valued field with a prescribed gauge transformation. As an illustration, we detail some examples. Two of them are based on known results: the first one provides a reinterpretation of the symmetry breaking mechanism of the electroweak part of the Standard Model of particle physics; the second one is an application to Einstein's theo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (C2), the Lorentz gauge symmetry SO is then substantial. 12 10 It happens that the abelian U(1) Higgs model can be treated via dressing along the same line, as is shown explicitly in [34]. This is directly relevant to our discussion of the electroweak model in the next section.…”
Section: Artificial Vs Substantial Gauge Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to (C2), the Lorentz gauge symmetry SO is then substantial. 12 10 It happens that the abelian U(1) Higgs model can be treated via dressing along the same line, as is shown explicitly in [34]. This is directly relevant to our discussion of the electroweak model in the next section.…”
Section: Artificial Vs Substantial Gauge Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Locally, i.e so long as one works on U ⊂ M seen both as a coordinate patch and a trivializing open set for the Lorentz bundle, one can decompose the tetrad as e = ut, where u = u a b ∈ S O(1, 3) and t = t b µ has the same d.o.f as the metric field and is such that g = t T ηt. This decomposition relies on the Schweinler-Wigner orthogonalization procedure, see [34] section 4.3 for details en references. Therefore, one has on the one hand u γ = γ −1 u, so that u is a (minimal) local SOdressing field.…”
Section: Artificial Vs Substantial Gauge Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is like a gauge fixing on the conformal component of the metric field. Rather, it might be viewed as a change of variables within the field space which g and τ belong to [23]. Hence, the field τ carries 1 as Weyl conformal weight and will play the rôle of dilaton as we shall see.…”
Section: The Wess-zumino Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a u may be interpreted as a change of variable in the field space of the (a, u)'s; see discussion in [23,29, see in particular section 2 in both of those references] on what we called the dressing field method, a construction which goes back to Dirac [30] and which, in turn, enters in the construction of the Wess-Zumino functional.…”
Section: Consider a Local Consistency Anomaly As An Element Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one doesn't want to be restricted to a torsion free geometry, and nevertheless wants to restore full gauge-invariance, then the so-called dressing field method is the way forward. See [26][27][28] for details, and the following for a brief recap. where vi is the anticommuting ghost field associated with infinitesimal conformal boosts.…”
Section: A Symmetries Of the Lagrangiansmentioning
confidence: 99%