2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.014904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauge dependence of calculations in relativistic Coulomb excitation

Abstract: Before a quantum-mechanical calculation involving electromagnetic interactions is performed, a choice must be made of the gauge to be used in expressing the potentials. If the calculation is done exactly, the observable results it predicts will be independent of the choice of gauge. However, in most practical calculations approximations are made, which can destroy the gauge invariance of the predictions.We compare here the results of coupled-channel time-dependent relativistic Coulomb excitation calculations, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3 mean that there is a sustained "exchange" of probability between the ground state and the GDR (also observed by the authors of Ref. [17]) that keeps taking place long after there is any apparent justification for such trade-off to occur.…”
Section: Classically Analogous Problemmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and 3 mean that there is a sustained "exchange" of probability between the ground state and the GDR (also observed by the authors of Ref. [17]) that keeps taking place long after there is any apparent justification for such trade-off to occur.…”
Section: Classically Analogous Problemmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Explicit expressions for are known that allow the particular transformation from Lorentz to Coulomb gauges [17].…”
Section: Results Of the Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements have been encountered individually in some studies. For example, Coulomb excitation [13,14] may also utilize a relativistic projectile, but in a perturbative and/or non-adiabatic way.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this apparent restriction is that ABHMW used the Coulomb gauge for the calculation of the quantized-field version of ṽγα (t), but they used the Lorentz gauge for the calculation of the classical field version. It is shown in Reference [19] that the versions of ṽγα (t) calculated in the two gauges agree in their on-shell Fourier components, but are generally different when ω = ω γα . In Sections III, IV, and V, we have shown that the quantized field and classical field treatments agree for all t, and so for all ω, if both are calculated in the same gauge.…”
Section: The Lorentz Gaugementioning
confidence: 99%