2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1537-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GATK hard filtering: tunable parameters to improve variant calling for next generation sequencing targeted gene panel data

Abstract: BackgroundNGS technology represents a powerful alternative to the standard Sanger sequencing in the context of clinical setting. The proprietary software that are generally used for variant calling often depend on preset parameters that may not fit in a satisfactory manner for different genes.GATK, which is widely used in the academic world, is rich in parameters for variant calling. However the self-adjusting parameter calibration of GATK requires data from a large number of exomes. When these are not availab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variants to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called using Haplotype from the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATC) with a sample ploidy of 3 (McKenna et al, 2010). Variants were hard filtered using GATC recommended parameters with an additional filter for allelic frequency (AF < 0.1) and genotype quality (GQ < 30.0) (Summa et al, 2017). Local nucleotide alignments were done with Mummer v4.0beta package (nucmer -c 100 -L 100).…”
Section: Phage Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called using Haplotype from the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATC) with a sample ploidy of 3 (McKenna et al, 2010). Variants were hard filtered using GATC recommended parameters with an additional filter for allelic frequency (AF < 0.1) and genotype quality (GQ < 30.0) (Summa et al, 2017). Local nucleotide alignments were done with Mummer v4.0beta package (nucmer -c 100 -L 100).…”
Section: Phage Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAMtools (v 1.4) software (Li, 2011) was used to estimate coverage of the reference genome. The filtered alignment files were used for the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertion/Deletions (InDels) using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, v3.6) software (De Summa et al, 2017). The CNVnator software (v 0.1.18) (Abyzov, Urban, Snyder, & Gerstein, 2011) was utilized to detect copy number variations (CNVs).…”
Section: Plant Sample Preparation and Re-sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the default thresholds for GATK hard filtering parameters [29] removed a large proportion of the FPs, applying Xenome to filter for human reads yielded superior performance in terms of substantially higher precision, as well as improvement in recall. In addition, Xenome filtering maintained the correlation between the predicted versus actual allele frequencies, which would otherwise decrease with higher mouse contamination ( Supplementary Table S2).…”
Section: Workflow For Calling Somatic Point Mutations and Indels In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of alternate loci in the genome assembly. The GRCh38.p5 human genome assembly includes 262 regions of alternate loci to account for human chromosomal regions that exhibit sufficient variability to prevent adequate representation by a single sequence [29]. As such, we aligned the reads to both primary and alternate chromosomal reference sequences using BWA-MEM with ALT-aware.…”
Section: Comparison Between Pdx and Tcga Datamentioning
confidence: 99%