2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-009-0457-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gating the pore of potassium leak channels

Abstract: A key feature of potassium channel function is the ability to switch between conducting and non-conducting states by undergoing conformational changes in response to cellular or extracellular signals. Such switching is facilitated by the mechanical coupling of gating domain movements to pore opening and closing. Two-pore domain potassium channels (K(2P)) conduct leak or background potassium-selective currents that are mostly time- and voltage-independent. These channels play a significant role in setting the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent experiments of Bagriantsev et al (2011Bagriantsev et al ( , 2012, Piechotta et al (2011), and Rapedius et al (2012) suggest that TREK1 channels may not gate directly at the lower bundle-crossing like many other classic tetrameric K 1 channels (Cohen et al, 2009;Mathie et al, 2010). Instead, it appears that most if not all regulators of TREK1 activity produce their effect by altering gating at the selectivity filter of the channel, regardless of where in the channel they interact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent experiments of Bagriantsev et al (2011Bagriantsev et al ( , 2012, Piechotta et al (2011), and Rapedius et al (2012) suggest that TREK1 channels may not gate directly at the lower bundle-crossing like many other classic tetrameric K 1 channels (Cohen et al, 2009;Mathie et al, 2010). Instead, it appears that most if not all regulators of TREK1 activity produce their effect by altering gating at the selectivity filter of the channel, regardless of where in the channel they interact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the pH-dependent opening of the so-called TASK-2 and Kir1.1 channels involves the respective deprotonation of an arginine (pK a = 8) and a lysine (pK a = 7) residue (34,35), which may lead to large conformational changes or local perturbations of the selectivity filter (36). Thus, it appears that APOL1 combines the pH-dependent solubility characteristics of bacterial pore-forming toxins, with the complex pH-gating behaviors more typical of eukaryotic channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gating of K 2P channels by extracellular H ϩ is known to occur at the selectivity filter by a process that has been thought to be, at least superficially, akin to C-type inactivation commonly encountered in other K ϩ channels (reviewed in Ref. 34). K ϩ dependence of TASK-1 pH o gating is in accord with this concept (11,35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%