1989
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gating of the afferent volley of the monosynaptic stretch reflex during movement in man.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. The time course of the changes in presynaptic inhibition of la fibres to soleus motoneurones has been investigated during a voluntary ramp-and-hold plantar flexion.2. Monosynaptic Ia facilitation of the soleus H reflex was evoked by stimulation of the inferior soleus (homonymous) and femoral (heteronymous) nerves. Changes in presynaptic inhibition of the I a fibres mediating the conditioning volleys were inferred from changes in the amount of reflex facilitation evoked by such constant conditioning s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
63
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of particular interest that an increased femoral nerve-induced facilitation is seen before and at the onset of plantarflexion (Fig. 6), but not during the actual movement (Figs 4 and 5; see also Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny, 1989). Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny (1989) suggested that the lack of increase of facilitation during the movement is caused by central programming, since the amount of facilitation always decreased in the middle of a ramp movement whatever the duration of the ramp and since the depression was also seen when the peripheral feedback from the muscles was blocked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is of particular interest that an increased femoral nerve-induced facilitation is seen before and at the onset of plantarflexion (Fig. 6), but not during the actual movement (Figs 4 and 5; see also Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny, 1989). Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny (1989) suggested that the lack of increase of facilitation during the movement is caused by central programming, since the amount of facilitation always decreased in the middle of a ramp movement whatever the duration of the ramp and since the depression was also seen when the peripheral feedback from the muscles was blocked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6), but not during the actual movement (Figs 4 and 5; see also Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny, 1989). Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny (1989) suggested that the lack of increase of facilitation during the movement is caused by central programming, since the amount of facilitation always decreased in the middle of a ramp movement whatever the duration of the ramp and since the depression was also seen when the peripheral feedback from the muscles was blocked. The observation in the present study of an increase of the FN-induced facilitation for small levels of plantarflexion, but not for stronger contractions, could suggest that a peripherally induced presynaptic inhibition may nevertheless contribute to the depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experiments were performed with a very weak tonic contraction involving only one motor unit, or at the onset of a phasic anisometric contraction, of relatively weak strength. With the phasic contractions the first stimulus to be delivered was triggered by the onset of EMG activity, which was recorded with a higher amplification than the reflex, rectified and connected to a triggering circuit (see Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny, 1989). In most cases the test stimulus also evoked an M response in FCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in presynaptic inhibition of afferents synapsing with propriospinal neurones have never been investigated in the cat. Nevertheless the possibility must be considered because, in the human lower limb, there is a decrease in presynaptic inhibition of monosynaptic Ia projections to motoneurones at the onset of voluntary contractions (Hultborn, Meunier, Pierrot-Deseilligny & Shindo, 1987 b;Meunier & Pierrot-Deseilligny, 1989). The present study was therefore undertaken to determine whether primary afferents projecting to propriospinal-like neurones are subject to presynaptic inhibition and whether changes in presynaptic inhibition contribute to the increase in excitability of the propriospinal-like system associated with a voluntary contraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%