2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gating has a negligible impact on dose delivered in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite longer treatment times, patients have reported high satisfaction when undergoing MRIgRT [ 56 ]. While some studies have shown that beam gating may only have small dosimetric impacts on online-adaptive MRIgRT, these studies did, in fact, implement “manual gating”, where dose delivery was interrupted in the majority of patients to initiate 3D couch corrections after large displacements noticed on the onboard MRI [ 58 ].…”
Section: Limitations Of Mrigrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite longer treatment times, patients have reported high satisfaction when undergoing MRIgRT [ 56 ]. While some studies have shown that beam gating may only have small dosimetric impacts on online-adaptive MRIgRT, these studies did, in fact, implement “manual gating”, where dose delivery was interrupted in the majority of patients to initiate 3D couch corrections after large displacements noticed on the onboard MRI [ 58 ].…”
Section: Limitations Of Mrigrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining reduced PTV margins and online adaptive re-planning may further reduce treatment related toxicities. However, long treatment session times associated with MRIgART and intra-fraction motion limit the extent to which PTV margins can be reduced without intra-fraction compensation ( 29 , 42 , 43 ). MRIgART with daily re-planning commonly uses prostate PTV margins ranging between 3 and 5 mm ( 44 48 ) with 5 mm in all directions except for 3 mm in the posterior direction remaining a standard ( 43 , 49 51 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRIgART with daily re-planning commonly uses prostate PTV margins ranging between 3 and 5 mm ( 44 48 ) with 5 mm in all directions except for 3 mm in the posterior direction remaining a standard ( 43 , 49 51 ). While techniques such as gating and/or baseline shift corrections can be used in conjunction with reduced PTV margins, this will add additional time to already long treatment sessions and therefore is impractical for some patients ( 42 , 43 ). This may be especially impactful on systems such as the Elekta Unity which does not support couch movement during treatment and thus, users must wait for baseline shift plans to be re-optimized or re-calculated prior to resuming treatment if target excursions occur ( 52 , 53 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular importance for ultra-hypofractionated treatment regimes (Finazzi et al 2020b) or single fraction treatments (Finazzi et al 2020c, Palacios et al 2022 for which dose inhomogeneities do not average out over the course of treatment. Recently, Xiong et al (2022) and Wahlstedt et al (2022) derived first-order approximations of the intrafractionally accumulated dose delivered in online adaptive MRgRT to the prostate and close-by OARs in presence of residual target motion within a gating window. They neglected interplay effects and assumed the shift-invariance of dose distributions (McCarter andBeckham 2000, Sharma et al 2012) in photon therapy and convolved a static dose distribution with the target trajectories observed on planar sagittal cine MR images acquired at MRIdian MRlinacs (ViewRay Inc., Oakwood Village, Ohio, USA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%