Gateway to Global Aging Data: Resources for Cross-National Comparisons of Family, Social Environment, and Healthy Aging

Abstract

Objectives The Gateway to Global Aging Data (Gateway; g2aging.org) is a data and information platform developed to facilitate cross-country analyses on aging, especially those using the international family of Health and Retirement studies. We provide a brief introduction to the Gateway to Global Aging Data, discussing its potential for cross-national comparisons of family, social environment, and healthy aging. Methods We summarize the survey metadata, study characteristics, and harmonized data available from the Gateway, describing the population represented in each study. We portray cohort characteristics and key measures of health and social environment from 37 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia using harmonized data. Results Significant cross-country heterogeneity was observed in many measures of family, social environment, and healthy aging indicators. For example, there was a three-fold difference in co-residence with children, ranging from 14% in Sweden to over 46% in Spain and Korea in 2014. From 2002-2014, the difference between informal care receipt in individuals of low and high wealth decreased by 6% in the US and remained unchanged in England. The percentage of individuals aged 50-59 living alone in 2012 varied fifteen-fold, from a low of 2% in China to a high of 30% in Mexico. Discussion By partnering with nationally representative studies around the globe, the Gateway to Global Aging Data facilitates comparative research on aging through the provision of easy-to-use harmonized data files and other valuable tools.

Association between socioeconomic status and health behaviour change before and after non-communicable disease diagnoses: a multicohort study

“…In this pooled multicohort study we used data from six prospective cohort studies done in 17 countries (appendix p 2) from the Global Aging, Health, and Policy programme: 13 the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study (CRELES); the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA); and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). These studies are sister studies of the HRS with similar survey protocols.…”

Investigating change across time in prevalence or association: the challenges of cross-study comparative research and possible solutions

“…This framework can inform and guide on-going conversation and debate on best practice in this field. Given the continued need to understand how social and health phenomena change across time and increasing numbers of initiatives to harmonise and make available data from different studies across time and place [4,8,111,112], we anticipate that such research will remain fruitful in future.…”

Disparities in cardiovascular disease prevalence among middle-aged and older adults: Roles of socioeconomic position, social connection, and behavioral and physiological risk factors

“…This study included six individual-level cohorts on aging that used modules similar to that of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the United States (14), with harmonized data provided to facilitate the cross-national study of aging (https:// g2aging.org/) (15). The HRS family surveys draw a nationally representative sample of the country's older population and are designed as longitudinal surveys with the goal of reinterviewing the same individuals on an approximately biennial basis.…”

“…The HRS family surveys draw a nationally representative sample of the country's older population and are designed as longitudinal surveys with the goal of reinterviewing the same individuals on an approximately biennial basis. To maintain a nationally representative sample over time, periodic refresher samples bring in newly age-eligible respondents, although the frequency of refresher samples varies across surveys (15).…”