2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr10469g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gate-tuned conductance of graphene-ribbon junctions with nanoscale width variations

Abstract: On applying partial gate voltages, we were able to perceive precise and minute conductance variations for the entire graphene electrode, arising mainly from different sub-micrometer scale widths of the graphene ribbons (GRs), which could not be distinguished using conventional global gating methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the electric field density between the SGM tip and area A (i.e., narrowest width region) is higher than that for areas B and C, the Fermi level tuning range in area A by V tip is larger than that in areas B and C. Furthermore, the variation in I DS induced by V tip values of −3 to 3 V for position B is smaller than that for positions A and C, indicating that the width of B is the widest in the GNR. The larger Fermi level tuning under the same V tip in positions A and C than in position B of the GNR underneath the HSQ structure can be attributed to a narrower width region on the GNR, leading to a high electric field density between the tip and the sample, as reported previously [20].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the electric field density between the SGM tip and area A (i.e., narrowest width region) is higher than that for areas B and C, the Fermi level tuning range in area A by V tip is larger than that in areas B and C. Furthermore, the variation in I DS induced by V tip values of −3 to 3 V for position B is smaller than that for positions A and C, indicating that the width of B is the widest in the GNR. The larger Fermi level tuning under the same V tip in positions A and C than in position B of the GNR underneath the HSQ structure can be attributed to a narrower width region on the GNR, leading to a high electric field density between the tip and the sample, as reported previously [20].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In particular, the current level of the GNR varied with the application of a partial gate via the SGM tip. Based on previous results [20][21][22], we propose that partial width fluctuations in the GNR vary the current in the GNR under the HSQ due to V tip gating. This finding can be applied to analyze the electrical properties of nanoelectronic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The surface potential was obtained by measuring the AC voltage ( V AC ) with a lock‐in amplifier and applying a feedback DC voltage ( V DC ) to cancel the electrostatic force between the Au‐coated tip and sample. [ 44,45 ] Here, while measuring the SKPM data, also V BG = 0 V or ±40 V was applied to observe surface potential with V BG applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%