2014
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastroschisis – what should be told to parents?

Abstract: Gastroschisis is a common congenital abdominal wall defect. It is almost always diagnosed prenatally thanks to routine maternal serum screening and ultrasound screening programs. In the majority of cases, the condition is isolated (i.e. not associated with chromosomal or other anatomical anomalies). Prenatal diagnosis allows for planning the timing, mode and location of delivery. Controversies persist concerning the optimal antenatal monitoring strategy. Compelling evidence supports elective delivery at 37  we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our results were consistent with their findings: mode of delivery was unrelated to NEC (pooled relative risk (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.58), duration until initiation of enteral feeding (pooled standardised RR −0.12, 95% CI −0.42 to 0.16) or length of hospital stay (pooled standardised RR −0.16, 95% CI −0.45 to 0.23). A more recent review by Lepigeon et al 30 also concluded that the available data did not support a requirement for CS delivery for infants with gastroschisis based on the following outcomes: bowel complications, primary closure, sepsis, length of hospital stay and mortality. Similarly, a review by Skarsgard et al 31 suggested that since there is no outcome benefit for routine CS delivery, then it is generally accepted that VD is the preferred mode of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, our results were consistent with their findings: mode of delivery was unrelated to NEC (pooled relative risk (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.58), duration until initiation of enteral feeding (pooled standardised RR −0.12, 95% CI −0.42 to 0.16) or length of hospital stay (pooled standardised RR −0.16, 95% CI −0.45 to 0.23). A more recent review by Lepigeon et al 30 also concluded that the available data did not support a requirement for CS delivery for infants with gastroschisis based on the following outcomes: bowel complications, primary closure, sepsis, length of hospital stay and mortality. Similarly, a review by Skarsgard et al 31 suggested that since there is no outcome benefit for routine CS delivery, then it is generally accepted that VD is the preferred mode of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parental counseling 54 should take into account the presence of IABD and polyhydramnios and their association with BA. These signs are suspicious of BA, and the possibility of postnatal and postsurgical complications should be disclosed with parents during the prenatal period.…”
Section: Implication For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This staging of GS would provide families and medical professionals with crucial information about the postnatal outcome [17]. The objective of this study is to establish the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound markers at the second and the third trimester of pregnancy in the prediction of complex GS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%