Gastrointestinal tolerability of once‐weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in adults with overweight or obesity, and the relationship between gastrointestinal adverse events and weight loss
Abstract:Aim: We evaluated gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) with once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in adults with overweight or obesity and their contribution to weight loss (WL).
Materials and methods: AE analyses pooled data from the Semaglutide TreatmentEffect in People With Obesity (STEP) 1-3 trials for participants randomized to 68 weeks of semaglutide 2.4 mg (n = 2117) or placebo (n = 1262). WL was analysed by presence/absence of GI AEs. Mediation analysis estimated WL effects mediated by and unrelated to … Show more
“…Reducing portions sizes and avoiding fatty foods may also help. 42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Globally, patients treated with 2.4 mg semaglutide in the STEP clinical programme have discontinued the treatment due to adverse events at a higher rate (7%) than those on placebo (3.1%), primarily due to GI adverse events (4.5% versus 0.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Globally, patients treated with 2.4 mg semaglutide in the STEP clinical programme have discontinued the treatment due to adverse events at a higher rate (7%) than those on placebo (3.1%), primarily due to GI adverse events (4.5% versus 0.8%). 42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 Following on from the theory that molecules acting on two or more different receptors would be expected to generate more weight loss than a single receptor agonist, new molecules have been engineered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 , 51 – 54 , 59 – 61 , 66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Like the other GLP-1 RAs, semaglutide has a black box warning for medullary thyroid carcinoma (although thyroid cancers have not been reported in human trials) and should not be used in patients with a personal or family history of medullary carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. There are also no concerns about an increased risk of other cancers.…”
The treatment of obesity can no longer be reduced to a simplistic view of weight loss. Metabolic adaptation leads to systematic weight regain following weight-loss efforts, and new obesity treatments should therefore aim to induce long-standing double-digit weight loss, and thus improve and even reverse obesity-associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes. Until now, only metabolic surgery has been able to achieve such a goal, but this invasive procedure cannot be offered on a large scale. Among the alternatives, lifestyle interventions and drug therapies have often been disappointing. The recent availability of once-weekly subcutaneous 2.4 mg semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; Wegovy™; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) has changed the scene, and semaglutide is considered a ‘game changer’ in the treatment of obesity. The results from the phase III STEP (Semaglutide treatment effect in people with obesity) clinical programme have shown that semaglutide provides clinically meaningful and sustained weight loss in ranges much higher than those achieved with previously available pharmacotherapies. These results led to the approval of semaglutide by regulatory authorities as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity in people with obesity or overweight, with at least one weight-related comorbidity. With data from phase II and III clinical trials showing that newer drugs (i.e. the glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide dual receptor agonist tirzepatide and the amylin agonist cagrilintide, either alone or combined) produce a greater sustained weight loss than semaglutide, an upstream ‘weight-centric’ strategy has emerged as a new standard for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
“…Reducing portions sizes and avoiding fatty foods may also help. 42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Globally, patients treated with 2.4 mg semaglutide in the STEP clinical programme have discontinued the treatment due to adverse events at a higher rate (7%) than those on placebo (3.1%), primarily due to GI adverse events (4.5% versus 0.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Globally, patients treated with 2.4 mg semaglutide in the STEP clinical programme have discontinued the treatment due to adverse events at a higher rate (7%) than those on placebo (3.1%), primarily due to GI adverse events (4.5% versus 0.8%). 42,[51][52][53][54][59][60][61]66 Following on from the theory that molecules acting on two or more different receptors would be expected to generate more weight loss than a single receptor agonist, new molecules have been engineered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 , 51 – 54 , 59 – 61 , 66 These GI side effects, along with slow gastric emptying, cannot, however, be considered responsible for the drug's effect on weight loss. 66 Like the other GLP-1 RAs, semaglutide has a black box warning for medullary thyroid carcinoma (although thyroid cancers have not been reported in human trials) and should not be used in patients with a personal or family history of medullary carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. There are also no concerns about an increased risk of other cancers.…”
The treatment of obesity can no longer be reduced to a simplistic view of weight loss. Metabolic adaptation leads to systematic weight regain following weight-loss efforts, and new obesity treatments should therefore aim to induce long-standing double-digit weight loss, and thus improve and even reverse obesity-associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes. Until now, only metabolic surgery has been able to achieve such a goal, but this invasive procedure cannot be offered on a large scale. Among the alternatives, lifestyle interventions and drug therapies have often been disappointing. The recent availability of once-weekly subcutaneous 2.4 mg semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; Wegovy™; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) has changed the scene, and semaglutide is considered a ‘game changer’ in the treatment of obesity. The results from the phase III STEP (Semaglutide treatment effect in people with obesity) clinical programme have shown that semaglutide provides clinically meaningful and sustained weight loss in ranges much higher than those achieved with previously available pharmacotherapies. These results led to the approval of semaglutide by regulatory authorities as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity in people with obesity or overweight, with at least one weight-related comorbidity. With data from phase II and III clinical trials showing that newer drugs (i.e. the glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide dual receptor agonist tirzepatide and the amylin agonist cagrilintide, either alone or combined) produce a greater sustained weight loss than semaglutide, an upstream ‘weight-centric’ strategy has emerged as a new standard for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
“…GLP‐1RAs are associated with gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea, diarrhoea, constipation and vomiting, which may lead to dehydration and subsequent hospitalization 74 . The GLP‐1RA regimen should be initiated with a low dose and increased gradually, while paying attention to the possible emergence of adverse events 106,107 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 The GLP-1RA regimen should be initiated with a low dose and increased gradually, while paying attention to the possible emergence of adverse events. 106,107 Use of SGLT2 inhibitors reduces eGFR levels by an average of 4 to 6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 immediately upon treatment initiation. 13,15,17 However, a smaller than 30% acute eGFR decrease in patients with diabetic kidney disease was not associated with a higher risk of adverse safety outcomes.…”
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at increased risk for hospital admissions, and acute hospitalizations are associated with a worse prognosis. However, outcomes related to all-cause hospital admissions (ACHAs) were often overlooked in trials that demonstrated the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This review includes a contemporary literature summary of emerging data regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs on ACHAs. The role of SGLT2 inhibitors in preventing ACHAs was shown in exploratory investigations of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and was further supported by real-world evidence (RWE). However, the association between GLP-1RA use and lower ACHA risk was mainly shown through RWE, with minimal available RCT data. We also discuss the advantages and challenges of studying ACHAs. Finally, we propose an easily memorized ("ABCDE" acronym) clinical approach to evaluating T2D status and treatment in admitted patients, as they transition from hospital to community care. This systematic approach may assist clinicians in recognizing possible pitfalls in T2D management, thereby preventing subsequent hospitalizations and improving patient prognoses. While acute admission can sometimes be perceived as a management failure, it should also be viewed as an opportunity to take action to prevent the next hospitalization.
ImportanceObesity affects approximately 19% of women and 14% of men worldwide and is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications (AOMs) modify biological processes that affect appetite and significantly improve outcomes, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.ObservationsAOMs should be administered in combination with lifestyle interventions and can be classified according to their mechanisms of action. Orlistat modifies digestive tract absorption and causes gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as oily fecal spotting and urgency, in more than 25% of patients. Centrally acting drugs, such as phentermine-topiramate and naltrexone-bupropion, regulate appetite in the brain and are associated with constipation in approximately 20% of patients, although the incidence of other adverse effects (eg, paresthesia, nausea) varies by medication. Nutrient-stimulated hormone-based medications, such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, mimic the actions of enteropancreatic hormones that modify central appetite regulation and provide multiple cardiometabolic weight-loss benefits. Adverse effects of these drugs include nausea (28%-44%), diarrhea (21%-30%), and constipation (11%-24%). The relative potency of adult obesity medications has been studied in meta-analyses. Compared with placebo, orlistat was associated with 3.1% greater weight loss (52 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]; 16 964 participants), phentermine-topiramate was associated with 8.0% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 3407 participants), naltrexone-bupropion was associated with 4.1% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 9949 participants), liraglutide was associated with 4.7% greater weight loss (18 RCTs; 6321 participants), semaglutide was associated with 11.4% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 4421 participants), and tirzepatide 15 mg was associated with 12.4% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 1972 participants).Conclusion and RelevanceObesity is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications are effective adjunctive therapy to lifestyle changes for improved weight loss and health outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.