Parasitic Diseases of Wild Mammals 2001
DOI: 10.1002/9780470377000.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Strongyles in Wild Ruminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
78
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(198 reference statements)
9
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the endoparasites found in our study are widely distributed and have been described for other deer species and domestic ruminants worldwide (Duarte et al, 2001;Hoberg et al, 2001). Amongst gastrointestinal parasites found in our study, only Ostertagia spp.…”
Section: Health Evaluation Of Pampas Deer (Ozotoceros Bezoarticus Celsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the endoparasites found in our study are widely distributed and have been described for other deer species and domestic ruminants worldwide (Duarte et al, 2001;Hoberg et al, 2001). Amongst gastrointestinal parasites found in our study, only Ostertagia spp.…”
Section: Health Evaluation Of Pampas Deer (Ozotoceros Bezoarticus Celsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…and Haemonchus spp. are recognized as potential primary pathogens for deer (Hoberg et al, 2001). Lungworms identified in our deer are considered pathogenic for deer (Munro, 1994b), but have not been mentioned for South American species (Duarte et al, 2001).…”
Section: Health Evaluation Of Pampas Deer (Ozotoceros Bezoarticus Celmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This serves to emphasize the pervasive nature of anthropogenic events, particularly conservationbased or management-based decisions for translocation that may influence the overall distribution of parasites and pathogens. These observations constitute a strong justification for development of baselines and archival collections for biodiversity to document faunal perturbation (e.g., Hoberg et al, 2001Hoberg et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Discussion Host and Geographic Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dorsal spined larvae (DSLs) recovered from feces cannot be reliably identified based on morphology, and polymorphism among larvae of some species has been noted (Hoberg et al, 2005). The advent of molecularbased methods has altered our approach to survey and inventory for protostrongylid and other nematodes in ungulates (e.g., Hoberg et al, 2001). Sequence data from individual DSL assessing both nuclear and mitochondrial loci are now used as epidemiologic probes to explore identity, distribution, and phylogeography based on geographically extensive and site intensive sampling (e.g., Jenkins et al, 2005;Mortenson et al, 2006;Kutz et al, 2007;Hoberg et al, unpubl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggs identi ed as having typical 'strongyle-egg' morphology can belong to a number of di erent genera, however in arctic and subarctic environments the abomasal nematodes Ostertagia gruehneri and Teladorsagia boreoarcticus are the most common in Rangifer sp. (Hoberg et al, 2001;Kutz et al, 2012). Also producing 'strongyle-type' eggs, Teladorsagia circumcincta has been previously reported in KS by Korsholm & Olesen (1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%