2021
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with BRAF gene fusions. A report of two cases showing low or absent KIT expression resulting in diagnostic pitfalls

Abstract: Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA, rare cases have shown to be driven by gene fusions involving kinases, mainly involving NTRK3, and rarely BRAF or FGFR1. BRAF gene rearrangements have been described in only two patients to date, as separate case reports. In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,31 Recently, we reported two cases of BRAF fusion-driven primary GISTs that showed weak to complete loss of KIT but preserved DOG1 immunoreactivity. 32 Our case is remarkable in that both KIT and DOG1 showed markedly diminished immunoreactivity, and could present a significant diagnostic pitfall in the absence of molecular evidence of GIST drivers. In mutant KIT-driven GISTs, the FGFR signaling pathway has been implicated as mechanisms of imatinib resistance in tumors lacking secondary KIT mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,31 Recently, we reported two cases of BRAF fusion-driven primary GISTs that showed weak to complete loss of KIT but preserved DOG1 immunoreactivity. 32 Our case is remarkable in that both KIT and DOG1 showed markedly diminished immunoreactivity, and could present a significant diagnostic pitfall in the absence of molecular evidence of GIST drivers. In mutant KIT-driven GISTs, the FGFR signaling pathway has been implicated as mechanisms of imatinib resistance in tumors lacking secondary KIT mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Other rare cases of primary fusion driver events in quadruple WT GISTs included two cases of ETV6::NTRK3 , reported separately and at least one being diffusely positive for CD117 9,31 . Recently, we reported two cases of BRAF fusion‐driven primary GISTs that showed weak to complete loss of KIT but preserved DOG1 immunoreactivity 32 . Our case is remarkable in that both KIT and DOG1 showed markedly diminished immunoreactivity, and could present a significant diagnostic pitfall in the absence of molecular evidence of GIST drivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein is mainly physiologically expressed in brain cortex, while overexpression has been reported in colorectal carcinoma and adenoma 16 . The AGAP3::BRAF fusion has previously been reported in a few cases from various tumor origins: colorectal carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, ovarian serous carcinoma, melanoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor 17–19 . The detection of this AGAP3::BRAF fusion seems important for the choice of a targeted treatment since it has been described to confer resistance to EGFR‐targeted and BRAF‐targeted therapies, in colorectal carcinoma and melanoma, respectively 20,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypically and morphologically, BRAF -mutant GISTs are similar to KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs [ 67 , 68 , 69 ]. More recently, BRAF fusions have been described in GISTs [ 70 ].…”
Section: Molecular Classification Of Gistsmentioning
confidence: 99%