2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Small Ruminants: Life Cycle, Anthelmintics, and Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
103
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
103
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the report of Rahmeto Abebe et al (2010) the prevalence of strongyle infection in sheep and goats showed no significant (P >0.05) variation. This might be due to similarities in agroecology and in management of both sheep and goats, kept by traditional extensive management system (Zalac, 2006). The study area characterized by communal grazing area, and hence, both sheep and goats have equal chance to acquire the infective larvae of strongyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the report of Rahmeto Abebe et al (2010) the prevalence of strongyle infection in sheep and goats showed no significant (P >0.05) variation. This might be due to similarities in agroecology and in management of both sheep and goats, kept by traditional extensive management system (Zalac, 2006). The study area characterized by communal grazing area, and hence, both sheep and goats have equal chance to acquire the infective larvae of strongyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed that the prevalence of nematode parasites in goats was 53.29% (97/182) which agree with finding of Zeryehun [13] in and around Haramaya district Eastern Ethiopia and Tigist et al [18] in South West Ethiopia who reported 54.61% and 52.6% respectively while it contrary to the previous study done by Kumsa et al [21] in central Ethiopia that reported 83.1% prevalence of nematodes of goats. The difference of findings could be occurred due to difference in sample size taken and type of utilized technique, ecological and climate diversity as well as the existing host range [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a second molt, larvae become the infective third-stage (L 3 ) about 5 days after passing out in the faeces. These larvae maintain the cuticle of the second stage as a protective sheath, which protects the L 3 from harsh environmental conditions and prevents it from feeding [37] (Figure 5). (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%