2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Abstract: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a commonly encountered chief complaint with a high morbidity and mortality. The emergency physician is challenged with prompt diagnosis, accurate risk assessment, and appropriate resuscitation of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Goals of care aim to prevent end-organ injury, manage comorbid illnesses, identify the source of bleeding, stop continued bleeding, support oxygen carrying capacity, and prevent rebleeding. This article reviews current strategies for risk stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
17
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, contrary to the literature, significant differences with respect to age, gender, and hemoglobin values in cases with mortality cannot be found in our study (3). From this point of view, our study shows that deciding the clinical severity of the patient in emergency department assessment on the basis of only these parameters can give rise to mistakes in patient management.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, contrary to the literature, significant differences with respect to age, gender, and hemoglobin values in cases with mortality cannot be found in our study (3). From this point of view, our study shows that deciding the clinical severity of the patient in emergency department assessment on the basis of only these parameters can give rise to mistakes in patient management.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The mortality rate was 2%, and all three patients were in the severe group, which was comparable to the reported NUGIB mortality of about 1-5% [13]. The re-bleeding rate (21%) was higher than in other researches (about 10%) [13,15,16]. This difference may be related to the higher proportion of high-risk patients with Forrest I, Forrest IIa/b and Dieulafoy patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the contrary, the median span of hospitalization in the severe group was signi cantly longer than in the mild group. This was acceptable since patients in the severe group need more time for comprehensive treatment and drug treatment in hospital, which are also indispensable for UGIB therapy [16]. Overall, our results showed that anemia did not associate with the mortality and rebleeding of high-risk NUGIB patients underwent endoscopic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Other less common aetiologies of UGIB are listed in box 1. The initial work-up for any suspected UGIB is upper endoscopy which not only confirms the source of bleeding but also allows potential control of the bleeding 9. In our case, an oesophageal source was ruled out, but given the large clot burden in the stomach and duodenum, the exact source of bleeding could not be identified on endoscopy.
Differential diagnosis for obscure upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed

Differential diagnosis for upper GI bleed

Oesophageal varices

Oesophageal ulcers

Gastritis

Gastric varices

Cameron erosions

Non-steroidal inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy

Vascular lesion (angioectasias)

Malignancy (adenocarcinoma, GI stromal tumour)

Mallory-Weiss tear

Portal hypertensive gastropathy

Haemobilia

Haemosuccus pancreaticus

Aortoenteric fistula

von Willebrand disease

Amyloidosis

…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%