Abstract:Background/Aims: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) are uncommon neoplasms that can present with or without clinical symptoms. In this study, we evaluated the incidence, prognosis, and temporal trends of G-NETs. Methods: We analyzed all cases of G-NETs registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2014. Incidence was estimated by age and joinpoint analyses. Survival rates were calculated and survival trends over time were evaluated. Results: A total of 3740 elig… Show more
“…GNENs were an orphan disease and accounted for 6.9% of all the GEP-NENs, representing 0.3-1.8% of all gastric malignancies [17][18][19]. Based on the up-to-date SEER database, our study revealed that the incidence of GNENs has increased gradually in the past 4 decades, consisting with the previous study [1,2,17]. Moreover, it was rapidly increased among those with localized and grade I tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The incidence of NENs has increased to 6.98/100,000 [1] in 2012 according to the data of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The increase could be observed among NENs at all sites, especially in gastric NENs (GNENs) with nearly 15-fold in the past 40 years [1], reaching up to 4.85/1,000,000 in 2014 [2]. According to WHO classification of 2010, NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) [3].…”
Background To investigate the recent epidemiological trends of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) and establish a new tool to estimate the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) and gastric neuroendocrine tumor (GNET). Methods Nomograms were established based on a retrospective study on patients diagnosed with GNENs from 1975 to 2016 in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. External validation was performed among 246 GNENs patients in Jiangsu province to verify the discrimination and calibration of the nomograms. Results The age-adjusted incidence of GNENs has increased from 0.309 to 6.149 per 1,000,000 persons in the past 4 decades. Multivariate analysis indicated independent prognostic factors for both GNEC and GNET including age, distant metastasis and surgical intervention (P < 0.05). In addition, T, N staging and grade were significantly associated with survival of GNEC, while size was a predictor for GNET (P < 0.05). The C-indexes of the nomograms were 0.840 for GNEC and 0.718 for GNET, which were higher than those of the 8th AJCC staging system (0.773 and 0.599). Excellent discrimination was observed in the validation cohorts (C-index of nomogram vs AJCC staging for GNEC: 0.743 vs 0.714; GNET: 0.945 vs 0.927). Survival rates predicted by nomograms were close to the actual survival rates in the calibration plots in both training and validation sets. Conclusions The incidence of the GNENs is increasing steadily in the past 40 years. We established more excellent nomograms to predict the prognosis of GNENs than traditional staging system, helping clinicians to make tailored decisions.
“…GNENs were an orphan disease and accounted for 6.9% of all the GEP-NENs, representing 0.3-1.8% of all gastric malignancies [17][18][19]. Based on the up-to-date SEER database, our study revealed that the incidence of GNENs has increased gradually in the past 4 decades, consisting with the previous study [1,2,17]. Moreover, it was rapidly increased among those with localized and grade I tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The incidence of NENs has increased to 6.98/100,000 [1] in 2012 according to the data of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The increase could be observed among NENs at all sites, especially in gastric NENs (GNENs) with nearly 15-fold in the past 40 years [1], reaching up to 4.85/1,000,000 in 2014 [2]. According to WHO classification of 2010, NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) [3].…”
Background To investigate the recent epidemiological trends of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) and establish a new tool to estimate the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) and gastric neuroendocrine tumor (GNET). Methods Nomograms were established based on a retrospective study on patients diagnosed with GNENs from 1975 to 2016 in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. External validation was performed among 246 GNENs patients in Jiangsu province to verify the discrimination and calibration of the nomograms. Results The age-adjusted incidence of GNENs has increased from 0.309 to 6.149 per 1,000,000 persons in the past 4 decades. Multivariate analysis indicated independent prognostic factors for both GNEC and GNET including age, distant metastasis and surgical intervention (P < 0.05). In addition, T, N staging and grade were significantly associated with survival of GNEC, while size was a predictor for GNET (P < 0.05). The C-indexes of the nomograms were 0.840 for GNEC and 0.718 for GNET, which were higher than those of the 8th AJCC staging system (0.773 and 0.599). Excellent discrimination was observed in the validation cohorts (C-index of nomogram vs AJCC staging for GNEC: 0.743 vs 0.714; GNET: 0.945 vs 0.927). Survival rates predicted by nomograms were close to the actual survival rates in the calibration plots in both training and validation sets. Conclusions The incidence of the GNENs is increasing steadily in the past 40 years. We established more excellent nomograms to predict the prognosis of GNENs than traditional staging system, helping clinicians to make tailored decisions.
“…Various factors had been identified to assess the prognosis of these cases like duration, sex, age group, size, site, grading and staging and other factors. These variables affect the outcome of disease in terms of morbidity and mortality 19 . There were no current or past researches available in the form of randomized control or retrospective studies available on GNET in Pakistan.…”
A 25 year old Sindhi speaking Pakistani male presented to his physician with history of dysphagia and weight loss. After initial evaluation and routine investigations patient was referred to gastroenterology unit for endoscopic evaluation and diagnosis.
“…One study showed an increased incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors from 0.31 per 1 000 000 patients in 1975 to 4.85 in 2014. 27 Gastric NETs have a site-specific distribution depending on the tumor subtype. For example, histamine-producing enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell NETs arise in the corpus/ fundus while somatostatin-expressing D-cell and gastrinexpressing G-cell NETs occur in the antrum.…”
Context.— The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system tumors discusses several advancements and developments in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of several digestive tract tumors. Objective.— To provide a summary of the updates with a focus on neuroendocrine neoplasms, appendiceal tumors, and the molecular advances in tumors of the digestive system. Data Sources.— English literature and personal experiences. Conclusions.— Some of the particularly important updates in the 5th edition are the alterations made in the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, understanding of pathogenesis of appendiceal tumors and their precursor lesions, and the expanded role of molecular pathology in establishing an accurate diagnosis or predicting prognosis and response to treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.