2012
DOI: 10.1172/jci64895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric bypass and banding equally improve insulin sensitivity and β cell function

Abstract: Bariatric surgery in obese patients is a highly effective method of preventing or resolving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the remission rate is not the same among different surgical procedures. We compared the effects of 20% weight loss induced by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery on the metabolic response to a mixed meal, insulin sensitivity, and β cell function in nondiabetic obese adults. The metabolic response to meal ingestion was markedl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
188
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
19
188
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Others also have shown that a matched 20% weight loss by either RYGBP or adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) result in similar improvement of insulin sensitivity. 67,68 These data demonstrate that the amount rather than the method of weight loss is important for the increase in insulin sensitivity. However, the greater improvement in β-cell function measured during an oral glucose challenge, after RYGBP compared with diet weight loss 7,69 underscores the importance of the engagement of the gut and the incretin effect, rather than weight loss, in the metabolic response to nutrient ingestion after RYGBP.…”
Section: Diabetes Relapsementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Others also have shown that a matched 20% weight loss by either RYGBP or adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) result in similar improvement of insulin sensitivity. 67,68 These data demonstrate that the amount rather than the method of weight loss is important for the increase in insulin sensitivity. However, the greater improvement in β-cell function measured during an oral glucose challenge, after RYGBP compared with diet weight loss 7,69 underscores the importance of the engagement of the gut and the incretin effect, rather than weight loss, in the metabolic response to nutrient ingestion after RYGBP.…”
Section: Diabetes Relapsementioning
confidence: 80%
“…1-3). (21) 258 (22) 140 (59) 90 (27) 419 (35) 68 (29) 170 (51) 516 (43) 30 ( (14) 65 (8) 42 (25) 32 (16) 197 (23) 68 (40) 144 (71) 579 (69) 61 ( Figure 1A-C suggests that reductions in glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR increase with increasing weight loss. Moreover, the slopes of the regression analyses revealed that weight changes at 2 and 10 years were, for all performed analyses, associated with changes in glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR within each of the surgery groups (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In patients without type 2 diabetes, it was shown that the improvement in insulin sensitivity was determined by the amount of weight lostdnot whether the patients had been treated with GBP or caloric restriction (29). Furthermore, another study of patients without type 2 diabetes showed that effects on insulin sensitivity and b-cell function were similar after GBP and banding after 20% weight loss, occurring after 16 and 22 weeks, respectively (27). Consequently, it is important to investigate whether long-term effects on risk factor changes are similar after GBP compared with restrictive procedures when adequate adjustments for degree of weight loss have been performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenging that assertion, Halpern et al (1) cite the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study, a population-based investigation not designed to address this question. They also mention one publication (8) showing that with major weight loss long after surgery (20% of total body weight), glucose homeostasis improvements appeared fairly similar between recipients of RYGB and gastric banding. Such substantial long-term weight loss, however, might mask additional weight-independent glycemic benefits, which are not disproven by this one article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%