1990
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.4.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gastric balloon to treat obesity: a double-blind study in nondieting subjects

Abstract: To determine its efficacy and safety in treating obesity, a silicone-rubber balloon was passed into the stomach of 10 nondieting, obese subjects. In a counterbalanced sequence, the balloon was inflated with 400 mL for 1 mo and deflated for 1 mo. Lower intakes of solid and liquid test meals (NS), significantly slower gastric emptying, and concomitant changes in glucose, insulin, glucagon, and cholecystokinin concentrations consistent with slower emptying resulted during balloon inflation. After balloon inflatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) The presence of inter-study variability between sham and not sham studies was not ascribable to mean or median age of patients but possibly to other factors. 6) The absence of psychological and psychiatric profile that is relevant for studies were the placebo effect have to be evaluated represents a very important confounding factor [10], [22], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [78], [79]. 7) A percentage of 5% of participants lost to the follow-up has been extracted from 30 on the 52 studies examined (ref.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) The presence of inter-study variability between sham and not sham studies was not ascribable to mean or median age of patients but possibly to other factors. 6) The absence of psychological and psychiatric profile that is relevant for studies were the placebo effect have to be evaluated represents a very important confounding factor [10], [22], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [78], [79]. 7) A percentage of 5% of participants lost to the follow-up has been extracted from 30 on the 52 studies examined (ref.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, balloons occupying about 30% of the rat gastric capacity (Geliebter et al, 1986) had a relatively large impact on food intake, reducing it by more than 25% (Geliebter et al, 1987). Surprisingly, in man, a 400 mL balloon occupying 30% of the stomach was unable to trigger a significant reduction in food intake (Geliebter et al, 1990). Similar inconclusive data have been obtained in dogs (Share et al, 1952).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…10,11 The Dow-Corning silicon gastric balloon was fashioned from a breast implant and was inflated with 300-400 ml of air, but, like the Ballobes balloon, gave minimal weight loss compared to control. 12,13 Pear-shaped gastric balloons were also used, inflated with either air or fluid, and resulted in weight loss in uncontrolled trials. 14,15 One of the most widely utilized gastric balloons, however, is the BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%