“…Methane activation with strong electrophiles is one of the major achievements of superacid chemistry. , The original mechanistic rationalization is based on the direct attack of the electrophile on the C−H bonds. ,,, Such a mechanistic scenario, however, is difficult to verify computationally or to support experimentally, because the highly exothermic protonation of alkanes occurs without an activation barrier; only product distributions rather than transition structures can be analyzed. ,− The mechanisms for the methane activation with electrophiles which are more stable than the proton, were studied over the past decade for a number of reagents, e.g., carbocations, NO + , , H 3 O 2 + , , SO •+ , “F + ”, B, B 2 , BH 2 , Cl 3 + , Cl 2 H + , electrophilic Pt complexes, − MO n + species, − and bare metal ions. ,− The computational results show that the electrophilic attack is directed toward the atoms (C or H) rather than the C−H or C−C bonds; this is exemplified by the TS for the CH 4 activation with NO + 834 and FeO 2+ (Figure ) ) and the hydrocarbon moieties of the transition structures for methane activation with NO + and FeO + should be emphasized: the TSs resemble inner-sphere electron-transfer structures.…”