2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2305-0500(13)60057-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaseous distension of the urinary bag during CO2 laparoscopy in the usual operative settings: Does the CO2 diffuse into the urinary bladder or is it a sign of urinary tract injury?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study concluded that gas distension of the urinary drainage bag was one of the signs of urinary tract injury [25] and that in the usual operative settings gas distension could not be explained without an injury. However, various publications have found that gas distension of urinary bags was not present in all cases of bladder injuries occurring during laparoscopy, even in the presence of urinary catheterization [26][27][28].…”
Section: Possible Clinical Implications Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study concluded that gas distension of the urinary drainage bag was one of the signs of urinary tract injury [25] and that in the usual operative settings gas distension could not be explained without an injury. However, various publications have found that gas distension of urinary bags was not present in all cases of bladder injuries occurring during laparoscopy, even in the presence of urinary catheterization [26][27][28].…”
Section: Possible Clinical Implications Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%