2010
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2010.501044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-Wall Partitioning of Organic Compounds in a Teflon Film Chamber and Potential Effects on Reaction Product and Aerosol Yield Measurements

Abstract: Gas-wall partitioning of organic compounds (OC) that included C 8 -C 16 n-alkanes and 1-alkenes and C 8 -C 13 2-alcohols and 2-ketones was investigated in two Teflon FEP chambers whose walls were either untreated, oxidized in sunlight, or previously exposed to secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Partitioning was nearly independent of chamber treatment, reversible, and obeyed Henry's law. The fraction of an OC that partitioned to the walls at equilibrium ranged from 0 to ∼65%. Values increased with increasing carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

26
519
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(553 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
26
519
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model treats the following processes explicitly: gas-phase diffusion, reversible adsorption, bulk diffusion, and chemical reactions in the gas and particle phases. The model also accounts for the loss of gas-phase SVOCs to the chamber Teflon wall (14,15) based on measurements for representative compounds in separate experiments (SI Materials and Methods, Gas-phase wall loss, Table S1 and S2). The physical state of the particle bulk is assumed to be semisolid with an average bulk diffusivity of 10 −12 cm 2 ·s −1 [a typical value for a semisolid state (16) (SI Materials and Methods)], consistent with observations that long-chain alkane-derived SOA particles bounce moderately on the smooth plates of an inertial impactor indicating behavior between that of liquid and glassy particles (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model treats the following processes explicitly: gas-phase diffusion, reversible adsorption, bulk diffusion, and chemical reactions in the gas and particle phases. The model also accounts for the loss of gas-phase SVOCs to the chamber Teflon wall (14,15) based on measurements for representative compounds in separate experiments (SI Materials and Methods, Gas-phase wall loss, Table S1 and S2). The physical state of the particle bulk is assumed to be semisolid with an average bulk diffusivity of 10 −12 cm 2 ·s −1 [a typical value for a semisolid state (16) (SI Materials and Methods)], consistent with observations that long-chain alkane-derived SOA particles bounce moderately on the smooth plates of an inertial impactor indicating behavior between that of liquid and glassy particles (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k w reflects the combined effects of turbulent mixing in the chamber, molecular diffusion of vapor molecules through the near-wall boundary layer, and any penetration into chamber walls. k w is likely to be chamber specific, as the extent of turbulent mixing depends on specific chamber operating conditions, but is reasonably independent of compound identity (11). Values of k w for a range of gases were estimated in one study (17) to range from ∼2 × 10 −5 to 10 −3 s −1 , corresponding to timescales of many hours to 10 min.…”
Section: Soa Modeling and The Influence Of Vapor Wall Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, 16; SI Appendix, The Statistical Oxidation Model). The SOM accounts for vapor wall losses based on observations showing that wall losses of semivolatile species in Teflon chambers are reversible (11). Such wall loss is modeled dynamically and depends on the equivalent OA mass of the chamber walls (C w , mg m −3 ), the first-order vapor wall loss rate coefficient (k w , s −1 ), and the vapor saturation concentration of compounds i (C p i , μg m −3 ).…”
Section: Soa Modeling and The Influence Of Vapor Wall Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, comparison between the evaporation kinetics observed in Grieshop et al (17) and in our laboratory indicates that 2.5 h is most likely the point at which the evaporation rate slows down and not where it ends. It has also been suggested that this dilution-induced evaporation type of experiment could be strongly affected by material deposited on smog chamber walls (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%