2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas transport inside and outside carbon supports of catalyst layers for PEM fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toyota, General Motors, and Nissan have suggested that the gas‐transport resistance obtained from this technique can include resistance in the ionomer surrounding the electrocatalyst . Furthermore, because the cathode platinum loading is 0.1 mg Pt cm −2 in this study, the resistance in the ionomer might be preferentially evaluated .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toyota, General Motors, and Nissan have suggested that the gas‐transport resistance obtained from this technique can include resistance in the ionomer surrounding the electrocatalyst . Furthermore, because the cathode platinum loading is 0.1 mg Pt cm −2 in this study, the resistance in the ionomer might be preferentially evaluated .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal particles have been shown to be mostly electrochemically active and are believed to have access to proton and O 2 through small openings (1-5 nm) in the carbon micropores [40,41]. But it is believed that the pores are too small for ionomer to intrude and form a direct proton conduction path to the Pt surface [39,[42][43][44][45]. Although it is hypothesized that condensed water can conduct protons in these pores, much remains unclear on the exact mechanism and the magnitude of the proton conductivity [46][47][48].…”
Section: Pem Fuel Cell Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works showed that a higher gas transport resistance was observed inside of pores than outside of pores for Pt catalysts with porous carbon supports, especially at high relative humidity. 30 Moreover, a much higher local oxygen transport resistance of Pt/HSC (high surface area) is measured than that of Pt/Vu (medium surface area) due its unsuitable pore structure. 62,63 The depth and shape of the pore will directly affect the O 2 transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that ionomers are blocked outside the pores and lead to higher transport resistance and lower performance. [28][29][30] Therefore, the contradiction is that the Pt particles deposited inside the pores alleviate the ORR kinetic loss but at the expense of increased proton conduct ohmic resistance and oxygen transport resistance, while Pt particles on the surface of carbon suffer from severe activity loss. 8 This reflects that the design of the catalyst structure is quite significant for performance improvement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%