2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1581644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-Surface Interaction Model Evaluation for DSMC Applications

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions: maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operati Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, Collins and Knox [ 83 ] implied that two parameters in this model could not be chosen arbitrarily and were related to the TMAC and NMAC. In the multi-flux model [ 84 ], the phase space of incident molecules is divided into several regimes according to the incident velocities and angles. By the combination of the diffusive model and CLL model with different possibilities, the multi-flux model can be also comparable with other models by selecting proper possibilities, but it is too specific for practical applications.…”
Section: Gas-solid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Collins and Knox [ 83 ] implied that two parameters in this model could not be chosen arbitrarily and were related to the TMAC and NMAC. In the multi-flux model [ 84 ], the phase space of incident molecules is divided into several regimes according to the incident velocities and angles. By the combination of the diffusive model and CLL model with different possibilities, the multi-flux model can be also comparable with other models by selecting proper possibilities, but it is too specific for practical applications.…”
Section: Gas-solid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Maxwell model is appropriate for DSMC applications. However, this GSIM is not appropriate for panel methods, because of the fundamentally unrealistic way in which it describes the physics of non-equilibrium scattering events (those which differ from the average) [35]. These scattering events are integrated across the surface to obtain the mathematical expressions for C d utilized by ADBSat, which magnify this inaccuracy.…”
Section: Case Equivalency Between Dsmcfoam and Adbsatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For no significant additional cost, the CLL model gave more realistic scattering distributions [11]. CLL model is widely recognized examples of its application are presented in multiple works [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: The Description Of Gas-surface Interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%