2017
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201700293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas Sparger Orifice Sizes and Solid Particle Characteristics in a Bubble Column – Relative Effect on Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer

Abstract: The relative effects of the size of gas sparger orifices and properties of solid particles on gas-liquid mass transfer are not yet fully understood. Here, the impact of sparger orifice sizes, solid particle shapes, and their loading amounts in a bubble column reactor on the absorption of oxygen in tap water was investigated. Their influence on the mass transfer coefficient and bubble hydrodynamic parameters was evaluated. The results show that the addition of solid particles can have both positive and negative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bubble columns are widely applied in chemical engineering, biotechnology engineering, and pharmaceutical industries due to their advantages of lower gas pressure, better heat transfer coefficients, absence of moving parts, especially getting over the drawback of high‐pressure drop, etc. . To achieve a reliable design and scale‐up strategy, it is essential to get a better understanding regarding their effects on multiphase turbulent flow in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Bubble columns are widely applied in chemical engineering, biotechnology engineering, and pharmaceutical industries due to their advantages of lower gas pressure, better heat transfer coefficients, absence of moving parts, especially getting over the drawback of high‐pressure drop, etc. . To achieve a reliable design and scale‐up strategy, it is essential to get a better understanding regarding their effects on multiphase turbulent flow in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Ring solid media resulted in the smallest bubbles, followed in order by sphere, cylinder, and square media, regardless of superficial gas velocity (Vg > 5.1 × 10 −3 m/s). These differences were possibly due to the different bubble break-up rates [13] and abilities for maintaining bubble size at higher gas flow [4] for each media. For instance, ring shape solid has both a higher bubble break-up rate due to its stronger force at the edges compared to edgeless solids and its ability to capture the bubbles inside avoiding bubble coalesce at higher gas flow [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bubble distribution in the reactor with media was smaller than that without media, approximately 22%-27% on average. Wongwailikhit et al (2018) [13] highlighted the three major influences of solid media addition on bubble hydrodynamics, i.e., increased bubbles breaking, increased bubbles coalescence, and decreased rising velocity. For this case, additional media was more likely enhancing the breaking rate than coalescence rate, which resulted in smaller bubbles with media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations