2022
DOI: 10.1002/app.53128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas separation improvement of PES/PSF/PVP blend mixed matrix membranes inclusive of amorphous MOFs by O2 plasma treatment

Abstract: In this study, crystalline UiO‐66 and NH2‐UiO‐66 metal organic frameworks (MOFs) were prepared by typical solvothermal method and then were transformed into amorphous phase by using ball milling process. The prepared MOFs were incorporated into tertiary polymer blend matrix including polyethersulfone/polysulfone/polyvinylpyrrollidone (PES/PSF/PVP:40/40/20 wt%) to examine gas separation performance of constructed mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). The synthesized MMMs were analyzed by FT‐IR, SEM, TGA, XRD, AFM, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of the 4th specimen (wood chips with 10% PES powder) shows lowest ash contain 0.43% (among specimens with additives). This result of ash can be explained by the fact that in time of combustion PES powder the products comprised of carbon (С), hydrogen (H2), oxygen (O2), and nitrogen (N2), where hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen are gases [27], [28]. In order to explain how the energy density of the fuel changes, it is necessary to take into account its constituent raw materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the 4th specimen (wood chips with 10% PES powder) shows lowest ash contain 0.43% (among specimens with additives). This result of ash can be explained by the fact that in time of combustion PES powder the products comprised of carbon (С), hydrogen (H2), oxygen (O2), and nitrogen (N2), where hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen are gases [27], [28]. In order to explain how the energy density of the fuel changes, it is necessary to take into account its constituent raw materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are microporous crystals consisting of organic linkers and metal‐containing nodes, have been widely explored. Due to their unique characteristics, including tunable nano‐scaled structure, ultrahigh surface area, and chemical diversity, MOFs have shown outstanding performance in adsorption, separation, sensors, and heterogeneous catalysis 17–19 . Till date, various MOFs have been used as heterogeneous catalysts to activate PMS for efficient degradation of organic dyes in water, especially Co‐based MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their unique characteristics, including tunable nanoscaled structure, ultrahigh surface area, and chemical diversity, MOFs have shown outstanding performance in adsorption, separation, sensors, and heterogeneous catalysis. [17][18][19] Till date, various MOFs have been used as heterogeneous catalysts to activate PMS for efficient degradation of organic dyes in water, especially Co-based MOFs. Lin et al first developed ZIF-67 as a heterogeneous catalyst to activate PMS for the degradation of Rhodamine B dye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a decline in membrane performance and severely limits their practical application for separation membranes. [18][19][20] Metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) have garnered significant attention due to their highly controllable topological structure, large surface area, high porosity, flexibility and functionalization capabilities. [21][22][23] These properties make MOFs ideal for a wide range of applications in industries such as gas storage, 24 heterogeneous catalysis, 25 electronics, 26 and biopharmaceutical delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite numerous modified approaches proposed, achieving a fault‐free membrane structure and ideal packing distribution remains challenging due to the different compatibility of the filler‐polymer interface during MMMs preparation. This leads to a decline in membrane performance and severely limits their practical application for separation membranes 18–20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%