1980
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(80)90049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-phase quasi-steadiness and fuel vapor accumulation effects in droplet burning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, larger radii correspond to larger mass flow rates for a given fuel mixture. The steady growth of the flames resembles earlier experimental results on the temporal variation of the flamefront standoff ratio for droplet combustion in micro-buoyancy [8,9], exhibiting the influence of fuel vapor accumulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As expected, larger radii correspond to larger mass flow rates for a given fuel mixture. The steady growth of the flames resembles earlier experimental results on the temporal variation of the flamefront standoff ratio for droplet combustion in micro-buoyancy [8,9], exhibiting the influence of fuel vapor accumulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This observation is inconsistent with the quasi-steady theory, which states that the ratio of the flame-to-droplet diameter is constant [9]. Subsequent studies have clarified that the main factors causing this contradiction are gas-phase diffusive unsteadiness [10], droplet heating [11], and fuel vapor accumulation effect [12].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…When the initial fuel vapor concentration around the droplet cloud is low, immediately after ignition most of the fuel vaporized is stored around the droplet cloud rather than being consumed at the flame [12]. The group combustion theory shows that the distance from the droplet cloud to the envelope flame increases with decreasing droplet spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying smaller P has been attempted by Law [13] and it has been revealed that the spherical droplet(s) flame was successfully obtained. Lastly, "miniaturization (i.e., adopting smaller L)" can also reduce Gr most effectively even without any special facility likely drop-tower and vacuum chamber to manipulate G and P. Although it is quite obvious, no successful study of "tiny" droplet(s) combustion has been reported so far; this is simply because that it is hard to establish steadily and difficult to diagnose.…”
Section: Strategies To Reproduce a "Tiny-spherical" Flamementioning
confidence: 99%