1979
DOI: 10.1139/v79-248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-phase proton-transfer reactions of the hydronium ion at 298 K

Abstract: Rate constants measured with the flowing afterglow technique at 298 ± 2 K are reported for the proton-transfer reactions of H3O+ with CH2O, CH3CHO, (CH3)2CO, HCOOH, CH3COOH, HCOOCH3, CH3OH, C2H5OH, (CH3)2O, and CH2CO. Dissociative proton-transfer was observed only with CH3COOH. The rate constants are compared with the predictions of various theories for ion–molecule collisions. The protonation is discussed in terms of the energetics and mechanisms of various modes of dissociation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of needed reference substances or of an independent way of defined in-situ product formation makes signal calibration very challenging, especially for RO 2 radicals 32 . Thus, calibration factors are calculated taking into account the following: (i) collision limit of the cluster formation rate from the ion-molecule reaction [22][23][24][33][34][35][36] , i.e., reagent ion + product → (product)reagent-ion cluster or via the ligand switch reaction (X)reagent ion + product → (product) reagent-ion cluster + X (X stands for a ligand) and (ii) negligible cluster losses inside the instrument. Concentrations calculated in this way represent lower limits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of needed reference substances or of an independent way of defined in-situ product formation makes signal calibration very challenging, especially for RO 2 radicals 32 . Thus, calibration factors are calculated taking into account the following: (i) collision limit of the cluster formation rate from the ion-molecule reaction [22][23][24][33][34][35][36] , i.e., reagent ion + product → (product)reagent-ion cluster or via the ligand switch reaction (X)reagent ion + product → (product) reagent-ion cluster + X (X stands for a ligand) and (ii) negligible cluster losses inside the instrument. Concentrations calculated in this way represent lower limits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of their flows required separate viscosity measurements as has been described (12). The sources of most of the neutral reactants and their purities have also been given previously (13). The allene, propyne, and toluene were of normal research grade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… h Experimental value was taken from Mackay et al and was determined using the flowing afterglow technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g Experimental value was taken fromŠpaněl et al 38 and was determined using the SIFT technique. h Experimental value was taken from Mackay et al 39 and was determined using the flowing afterglow technique. i Theoretical and experimental values determined byŠpaněl and Smith.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%