1997
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-phase NO +  affinities

Abstract: A scale of relative gas-phase NO ؉ binding energies (BEs) ؉ BE of thymine, the only one accessible to direct measurement, amounts to 35.6 ؎ 2 kcal⅐mol ؊1 , which underlines the predictive value of the correlation. This study reports the second successful extension of the kinetic method to the evaluation of the absolute BEs of polyatomic cations, following our recent application to the strictly related NO 2 ؉ ion.The chemistry of the nitryl ion, NO ϩ , is the focus of active interest, recently heightened by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize that, at the G2(MP2) level of theory, the NOA(H 2 O) is calculated to be lower than the NOA(H 2 S). This ordering is in keeping with the experimental study of Cacace et al [17], but at variance with the theoretical values obtained by Torday et al [20], and to a less extent, by Nguyen et al [19], see Table 1.…”
Section: Nitrosonium Complexes Of Hydrogen Sulfide and Methanethiolcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…It is important to emphasize that, at the G2(MP2) level of theory, the NOA(H 2 O) is calculated to be lower than the NOA(H 2 S). This ordering is in keeping with the experimental study of Cacace et al [17], but at variance with the theoretical values obtained by Torday et al [20], and to a less extent, by Nguyen et al [19], see Table 1.…”
Section: Nitrosonium Complexes Of Hydrogen Sulfide and Methanethiolcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Note that the major approximation in deriving the *(*H) form of Eqn (1) is that entropic e †ects cancel. In practice, neither the *(*H) nor the *(*G) approximation is completely valid ; some authors prefer the *(*G) formulation19 while others implicitly consider the *(*H) form to be the more fundamental20 (H. N. Lee The popularity of the kinetic method is the result of several favorable factors : a high degree of sensitivity to di †erences in thermochemical quantities, including subtle di †erences due to isotopic substitution,24 generally excellent agreement with values obtained by other methods (for example, the NO`affinities measured by Cacace et al 25 show a mean discrepancy of^0.2 kcal mol~1 and a maximum discrepancy of^0.5 kcal mol~1 (1 kcal \ 4.184 kJ)), the speed with which measurements can be made and the fact that they can be performed using any instrument capable of tandem mass spectrometry experiments. In addition, the method shares the common advantage of all tandem mass spectrometric experiments that it is not necessary to work with pure samples.…”
Section: Origins and Characteristics Of The Kinetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous studies interrelated the PA of water to the NO + chemical ionization binding energies (BEs), creating an absolute NO + affinity scale (Cacace et al, 1997). The study used the H 2 O-NO + BE as a reference anchor between the two conjugated parameters and concerned various classes of ligands (alkyl halides, alkyl nitrates, alcohols, nitro-alkanes, nitriles, aldehydes, ketones, aromatic and heterocyclic compounds).…”
Section: Experimental Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%