2011
DOI: 10.1002/mas.20343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas‐phase basicities of polyfunctional molecules. Part 2: Saturated basic sites

Abstract: The present article is the second part of a general overview of the gas-phase protonation thermochemistry of polyfunctional molecules. The first part of the review (Mass Spectrom. Rev., 2007, 26:775-835) was devoted to the description of the physico-chemical concepts and of the methods of determination, both experimental and theoretical, of gas-phase basicity. Several clues concerning the structural and energetic aspects of the protonation of isolated species have been emphasized. In the present article, speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(395 reference statements)
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monodentate tmtu complex coordinates through the 8 thioketone S atom, while the bidentate complex is coordinated to uranium by both a thioketone S atom and a thioamide N atom. Because protons generally bind to one nucleophilic site in a molecule, 8 this unexpected bidentate coordination of tmtu to uranium is exemplary as to why PAs should not necessarily correlate well with MCAs when a second coordinating electron donor such as N is present in the ligand. The computed structure of UO 2 (tmtu) 4 …”
Section: Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monodentate tmtu complex coordinates through the 8 thioketone S atom, while the bidentate complex is coordinated to uranium by both a thioketone S atom and a thioamide N atom. Because protons generally bind to one nucleophilic site in a molecule, 8 this unexpected bidentate coordination of tmtu to uranium is exemplary as to why PAs should not necessarily correlate well with MCAs when a second coordinating electron donor such as N is present in the ligand. The computed structure of UO 2 (tmtu) 4 …”
Section: Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation based upon the labelling studies (Fig. 2c), which highlight that radical cation formation involves H atom abstraction followed by proton transfer, is that as the linker size increases, the proton affinity of H 2 NXSH is likely to increase (based on the proton affinities of related amine alcohols and diamines [21]), making proton transfer from H 3 NXSH + to the sugar radical, [M À H] , less likely. Finally, the fact that methyl mannopyranosides produce less of the radical cation than methyl galactopyranosides and methyl glucopyranosides highlights that the structure of the sugar also plays a role in the yield of [M ] + produced.…”
Section: Step 2: Cid Of [H 3 Nxs + M] +mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The largest difference between the calculated and evaluated entropies in our case amounts to 22 J mol −1 K −1 (for base 12) indicating that neglecting the conformer mixing and hindered rotations could be the origin of the observed discrepancy between the calculated and experimental entropies of protonation. The errors in entropies are expected to have small impact on the measured GBs since the errors in entropies cancel out with the errors of the PA values [16,[29][30][31][32]. To test whether possible errors in the entropies cause significant deviations of the PAs we compared the measured GBs and PAs with the data calculated using several calculation approaches (see below).…”
Section: Basementioning
confidence: 98%
“…[32,40,41] as the most recent ones. Besides being dependent on the level of theory, the accuracy of the calculated GB and PA values depends strongly on effectively and properly identifying the most stable neutral and protonated structures.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Calculated And Experimental Basicities Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation