2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas permeation effect on the Two-Section Two-Zone Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactor (TS-TZFBMR) fluid dynamics: A CFD simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to regions above the extraction locations, the bed section below the active membrane panel seemed hardly to be affected by gas extraction, as indicated by only a slight increase of the σ r at DP1 and DP2 with the activation of membranes #2 and #3, respectively. According to studies by Julián et al [22], gas extraction through an immersed tubular membrane or a reactor-wall membrane were also found to exert minor influences on the bubble properties in the region below the permeation zone in a two-section two-zone fluidized bed membrane reactor (TS-TZFBMR). The power spectra of the differential pressure signals measured at DP1, DP2 and DP3 (local bed sections), with gas extracted from membrane #1, #2 and #3, respectively, at a rate of 1.5 L/min, are illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Effects Of Gas Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to regions above the extraction locations, the bed section below the active membrane panel seemed hardly to be affected by gas extraction, as indicated by only a slight increase of the σ r at DP1 and DP2 with the activation of membranes #2 and #3, respectively. According to studies by Julián et al [22], gas extraction through an immersed tubular membrane or a reactor-wall membrane were also found to exert minor influences on the bubble properties in the region below the permeation zone in a two-section two-zone fluidized bed membrane reactor (TS-TZFBMR). The power spectra of the differential pressure signals measured at DP1, DP2 and DP3 (local bed sections), with gas extracted from membrane #1, #2 and #3, respectively, at a rate of 1.5 L/min, are illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Effects Of Gas Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No densified layers were observed during gas extraction when Geldart B type particles (400~600 µm) were used as bed material in experiments conducted by Helmi et al [20]. In addition, with flat membranes installed, both a reduction [20][21][22] and a slight increase [16] in the average bubble size were observed during gas extraction from the fluidized bed. Also, Deshmukh et al [11] experimentally demonstrated that the distributive feeding of oxygen via porous membranes decreased axial gas back-mixing, while the addition of gas through flat membranes was found to increase the gas back-mixing [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations can be terminated after constitutive relations have been provided, and these are derived from the empirical statistics or by using the kinetic theory based on granular flow [ 30 , 31 ]. In the ANSYS FLUENT, two different multiphasic models can be obtained, from which the Volume of Fluid (VOF) model and the Eulerian model are used and integrated to form the mathematical models [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. One of the most complicated multiphasic models in the ANSYS FLUENT is the Eulerian model.…”
Section: The Reactions and Kinetic Model For Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Wassie et al experimentally demonstrated that a stable densified zone in the bed consisted of only smaller particles when the gas was extracted via flat vertical membranes placed at the back of the column; this was especially noticeable at high extraction rates. No densified layers were observed during the gas extraction when Geldart B‐type particles (400–600 μm) were used as the bed material in experiments carried out by Helmi et al When flat membranes were installed, both a reduction and a slight increase in the average bubble size were observed during the gas extraction from the fluidized bed. In addition, most available studies on the hydrodynamics of FBMR have been carried out at room temperature .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No densified layers were observed during the gas extraction when Geldart B‐type particles (400–600 μm) were used as the bed material in experiments carried out by Helmi et al When flat membranes were installed, both a reduction and a slight increase in the average bubble size were observed during the gas extraction from the fluidized bed. In addition, most available studies on the hydrodynamics of FBMR have been carried out at room temperature . The characteristics of the bubble phase or emulsion phase in FBMR have been investigated using experimental techniques such as particle image velocimetry, digital image analysis, electrical capacity, magnetic resonance tomography, and optical fiber detection .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%