2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas–liquid two-phase flowrate measurement in pseudo-slug flow with Venturi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work was carried out in the fluent module of ANSYS Workbench software using FEM method. It was regarded as an effective tool for the design and optimization of Venturi tubes [18] [19] [20]. As mentioned before, a three-jet flow needs a higher suction pressure that caused by negative pressure effect, while negative pressure effect is highly depends on flow velocity.…”
Section: Methods and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was carried out in the fluent module of ANSYS Workbench software using FEM method. It was regarded as an effective tool for the design and optimization of Venturi tubes [18] [19] [20]. As mentioned before, a three-jet flow needs a higher suction pressure that caused by negative pressure effect, while negative pressure effect is highly depends on flow velocity.…”
Section: Methods and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slightest RE of liquid phase on target domain samples is around 10%. Wu et al [12] measured the gas-liquid flow rates of pseudo-slug flow based on the differential pressure (DP) of Venturi. The liquid film region and pseudo-slug body region were distinguished at first, and then different models were used to calculate the flow rates in the liquid film and pseudo-slug body regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%