2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas–liquid mass transfer and axial dispersion in solid foam packings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
94
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 The mass transfer per unit of energy is thus much lower than for most conventional reactors. 19 The mass transfer coefficient, however, is much higher than for conventional equipment, as is shown in Figure 8. 19,20 A high mass transfer coefficient can have a large influence on the selectivity in the case of competitive or consecutive reactions.…”
Section: Energy Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…18 The mass transfer per unit of energy is thus much lower than for most conventional reactors. 19 The mass transfer coefficient, however, is much higher than for conventional equipment, as is shown in Figure 8. 19,20 A high mass transfer coefficient can have a large influence on the selectivity in the case of competitive or consecutive reactions.…”
Section: Energy Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results illustrate how two-phase flow heat transfer is improved by using Metal Foam. (Stemmet et al, 2007) studied adiabatic co-current two-phase (water/air) flows in metallic foams. They showed that the relative permeability model by (Saez & Cabonell, 1985) can be used to describe the saturation (named in this paper liquid hold up) in structured solid foam packing.…”
Section: Adiabatic Two-phase Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a novel rotor-stator spinning disc reactor, Meeuwse et al [118] reported that the mass transfer coeffi cient ( k GL a GL ) is one order of magnitude higher than the conventional reactor system; however, the energy input is around three orders of magnitude higher ( Figure 30 transfer per unit of energy dissipation is around 80 ml 3 MJ -1 [121] . From Figure 23 is can also be seen that the mass transfer coeffi cient is higher as compared to the conventional equipment [118][119][120]. The higher mass transfer coeffi cients in the rotor-stator spinning disc reactor can have a significant infl uence on the selectivity in the case of competitive or consecutive reactions.…”
Section: Spinning Disc Reactor Technologymentioning
confidence: 82%