1960
DOI: 10.1038/188801a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-Insulation of a Hot Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving such a versatility using a typical thermal plasma is not feasible mainly because of substantial heat conduction via ion loss to the surrounding19 which can in turn alter the kinetics of reaction. Additionally an arc channel developed under the sole effect of Ohmic heating is limited in dimension to the size of the electrode20 and is not homogenous owing to lower collision frequency in the absence of screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving such a versatility using a typical thermal plasma is not feasible mainly because of substantial heat conduction via ion loss to the surrounding19 which can in turn alter the kinetics of reaction. Additionally an arc channel developed under the sole effect of Ohmic heating is limited in dimension to the size of the electrode20 and is not homogenous owing to lower collision frequency in the absence of screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Alfvén and Smårs [547] the magnetic pressure was important for confinement, and the surrounding gas was considered as high density gas-insulation. Fälthammar [108] investigated the steady-state cross-field thermal conduction losses of such a Z-pinch, as discussed in section 2.3.…”
Section: Gas-embedded Pinchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An applied longitudinal magnetic field serves three purposes: It reduces the energy loss due to heat conduction, it confines the energetic a-particles, and it reduces the radial diffusion velocities. To reduce the heat conduction a strong field seems to be advantageous [5].…”
Section: The Reactor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%