1977
DOI: 10.1086/155695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas in globular clusters. II - Time-dependent flow models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other second-parameter cluster in the same set (see Section 5.3.2) is M12. It is located just below M56 and NGC 6934 in Figure 39, and since its mass is within the ∼0.1-0.15 dex uncertainty associated with the dashed line (see VandenBerg & Faulkner 1977), it may or may not be able to develop a steady-state outflow. Of the GCs that are represented by open circles, the ones that seem to have the most anomalous locations on the mass-v e,0 plane are M3 and M53.…”
Section: On the Retention Of Mass-loss Materials By Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The other second-parameter cluster in the same set (see Section 5.3.2) is M12. It is located just below M56 and NGC 6934 in Figure 39, and since its mass is within the ∼0.1-0.15 dex uncertainty associated with the dashed line (see VandenBerg & Faulkner 1977), it may or may not be able to develop a steady-state outflow. Of the GCs that are represented by open circles, the ones that seem to have the most anomalous locations on the mass-v e,0 plane are M3 and M53.…”
Section: On the Retention Of Mass-loss Materials By Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For our cluster sample, the apparent overlap of clusters represented by both open and filled circles at a value of log M/M just above 5.1 (the location of the horizontal, dashed line) appears to mark the mean transition mass between lower mass GCs that develop steady-state winds and higher mass systems that could acquire growing gas reservoirs at their centers as a result of gas inflows. (This transition mass is predicted to vary inversely with the value of the concentration parameter, c; see VandenBerg & Faulkner 1977) In support of this possibility, we note that NGC 6752 and M30 are collapsed-core GCs with c = 2.50 (according to the 2010 edition of the catalog compiled by Harris 1996); consequently, it would not be too surprising that they might be able to retain the gas from low-velocity winds when other clusters of similar mass but lower central concentrations (such as NGC 6584 and NGC 6934, which both have c ≈ −1.5) develop steady-state outflows. NGC 6397 and M70 are also collapsedcore, c = 2.50 GCs, and their present masses, which are less than those of NGC 6752 and M30, appear to be low enough ( 10 5 M ) that winds should be able to dissipate the gas which is produced by normal stellar mass-loss processes.…”
Section: On the Retention Of Mass-loss Materials By Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The central escape speed v e from a globular cluster is given by the equation (King 1966;VandenBerg and Faulkner 1977) v 2. e GMJSttW 0 r eff \ 9/1* 10 c/2 +2X 10…”
Section: The Retention Of Primordial Nova Ejecta Within Globular Clusmentioning
confidence: 99%