2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas hold-up and liquid film thickness in Taylor flow in rectangular microchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 The liquid slug length of Taylor flow in microchannels is determined by the system parameters such as the superficial gas and liquid velocities, the fluid properties and the surface properties of the microchannel. 44,45 In general, increasing the gas velocity at a constant liquid velocity leads to shorter liquid slugs, and our experimental results demonstrated this principle, as shown in Figure 8a. Moreover, some researchers [46][47][48] had proposed empirical correlations for predicting the length of liquid slug of Taylor flow in microchannels due to its importance.…”
Section: Effect Of Superficial Gas Velocity On Hydrodynamics and Liqusupporting
confidence: 59%
“…43 The liquid slug length of Taylor flow in microchannels is determined by the system parameters such as the superficial gas and liquid velocities, the fluid properties and the surface properties of the microchannel. 44,45 In general, increasing the gas velocity at a constant liquid velocity leads to shorter liquid slugs, and our experimental results demonstrated this principle, as shown in Figure 8a. Moreover, some researchers [46][47][48] had proposed empirical correlations for predicting the length of liquid slug of Taylor flow in microchannels due to its importance.…”
Section: Effect Of Superficial Gas Velocity On Hydrodynamics and Liqusupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The pressure drop over a single gas bubble is described by the classical theory of Bretherton (1961), of which, the applicability is extended up to a capillary number Ca gl of 0.01 and Reynolds numbers Re gl in the order of 10 2 using the scaling analysis of Aussillous and Quéré (2000). The pressure drop per unit channel length is obtained by combining the contributions of both sources using a mass balance based Taylor flow model previously developed by the authors (Warnier et al 2007). The model shows that (1) the additional pressure drop caused by the presence of the gas bubbles depends on the bubble frequency and the bubble velocity, and (2) its contribution to the overall pressure drop relative to that of the frictional pressure drop in the liquid phase decreases with increasing gas bubble velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kreutzer et al (2005b) Aussillous and Quéré (2000) is used to obtain an expression for the pressure drop over a single gas bubble accounting for non-negligible liquid film thickness. A mass balance-based model for gasliquid Taylor flow previously developed by the authors (Warnier et al 2007) is used to describe the fraction of channel length occupied by liquid having a non-zero velocity causing the liquid frictional pressure drop. The mass balance based model is then also used to obtain the pressure drop per unit channel length from the liquid frictional pressure drop and the pressure drop over a single gas bubble.…”
Section: The Pressure Drop Over a Single Gas Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first axial part (3.3 cm) of the micro channel is empty and the second part (3.3 cm) contains a hexagonal array of 3-lm pillars having a height of 50 lm. Different pitches (x pillar and y pillar ) are used Microfluid Nanofluid (2010) 9:131-144 133 (width:height) is well-described for slug/Taylor and bubbly flow by the Armand correlation (Armand 1946;Warnier et al 2008):…”
Section: Two-phase Gas Hold-upmentioning
confidence: 99%