2008
DOI: 10.1159/000146064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas Embolism Caused by Portal Vein Gas: Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: Introduction: We describe a case of pulmonary gas embolism caused by portal vein gas (PVG) observed using echocardiography. Echography revealed gas flowing through the hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, right atrium, and right ventricle, as well as pulmonary hypertension. The patient was diagnosed as having pulmonary gas embolism caused by PVG. Objective: We consider PVG routes to pulmonary circulation, diagnosis of gas embolism caused by PVG, and treatment of gas embolism caused by PVG.Methods: We reviewed rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In human HPVG cases, HPVG may pass into a systemic vein through the liver [6] or a portosystemic shunt [8]. Gas in a systemic vein may cause pulmonary, arterial, or systemic gas embolism [5]. In the present case, gas embolism was noted in the stomach, liver, and spleen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In human HPVG cases, HPVG may pass into a systemic vein through the liver [6] or a portosystemic shunt [8]. Gas in a systemic vein may cause pulmonary, arterial, or systemic gas embolism [5]. In the present case, gas embolism was noted in the stomach, liver, and spleen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The next part of this route is from the portal vein to the systemic vein. Portal vein gas can pass to the systemic vein via two routes: through the liver and through a portosystemic shunt [7][8][9]. In this case, the flow of microbubbles from the hepatic vein to the inferior vena cava was observed, suggesting that the bubbles passed through the sinusoids to the inferior vena cava.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%