2007
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2007.369513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas discharge caused by triboelectricity around a contact during friction between insulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting parameters were varied 185 until the model showed a reasonable fit to the experimental results for = 1.4 µC m -2 and = 11000 µm 2 . We note that surface charge densities characterized by = 1.4 µC m -2 are reasonable, as they are similar to results found experimentally in glass particle systems (Waitukaitis et al, 2014), and they are significantly smaller than surface charge densities measured for triboelectrically charged quartz (Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Shen et al, 2016). Results…”
Section: Laboratory Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fitting parameters were varied 185 until the model showed a reasonable fit to the experimental results for = 1.4 µC m -2 and = 11000 µm 2 . We note that surface charge densities characterized by = 1.4 µC m -2 are reasonable, as they are similar to results found experimentally in glass particle systems (Waitukaitis et al, 2014), and they are significantly smaller than surface charge densities measured for triboelectrically charged quartz (Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Shen et al, 2016). Results…”
Section: Laboratory Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Particle diameters were based on a lognormal size distribution characteristic of atmospheric dust with = 1.5 µm and = 0.75 µm (Reid, 2003). Particle surface charge densities were based on a normal distribution with = 0 and = 110 µC m -2 such that half the particles are of each polarity and highly charged particles (two standard deviations from the mean) have surface charge 235 densities characteristic of triboelectrically charged quartz (Miura and Arakawa, 2007). Simulations were carried out for 10 5 particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For electrostatic forces to account for these deviations in size distributions of atmospheric dust particles, σ E must be on the order of ∼ 10 mC V m −3 . To the authors' knowledge, field studies of atmospheric dust have not measured surface charge densities of dust particles to confirm whether particles have sufficient charge for electrostatic effects to be significant; we note that volumetric charge densities have been measured (Nicoll et al, 2011) but cannot be translated to surface charge densities, which may be much larger than volumetric charge, which is the net charge of a distribution of negatively and positively charged particles. However, we emphasize that surface charge densities on the order of ∼ 10 to ∼ 100 µ C m −2 , which could cause significant electrostatic effects on transport, are routinely observed in laboratory set-tings (Cottrell, 1978;Donald, 1968;Horn and Smith, 1992;Matsuyama et al, 2003;Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Nordhage and Bäckström, 1977;Shen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Modeling Field Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, we emphasize that surface charge densities on the order of ∼ 10 to ∼ 100 µ C m −2 , which could cause significant electrostatic effects on transport, are routinely observed in laboratory set-tings (Cottrell, 1978;Donald, 1968;Horn and Smith, 1992;Matsuyama et al, 2003;Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Nordhage and Bäckström, 1977;Shen et al, 2016). While charges on particles may decay through gas neutralization, experiments have found surfaces retaining charge even after days of exposure to ambient conditions (Olthuis and Bergveld, 1992;Yuan and Li, 2005;Leonov et al, 2006) and charged dust has been observed in the atmosphere even after being transported for long times (Nicoll et al, 2011;Harrison et al, 2018;Renard et al, 2018). Moreover, subsequent particle collisions during transport could further charge particles through the triboelectric effect.…”
Section: Modeling Field Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, our conclusions regarding the relative impor tance of electrostatic forces depend strongly on the surface charge density a. We note that the charge density on sur faces has been reported with values of ~10-6 [51,52], ~10-5 [53,54], ~10-4 [7,[55][56][57], and ~10-3 C m-2 [58]. As discussed earlier, FE /FV for a given system can be well approximated using analytic expressions by estimating that FE « FE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%