Abstract:The use of miniaturized Gas Chromatography -Differential Mobility Spectrometry (GC-DMS) is shown for the detection and identification of coliform bacteria (including Escherichia coli) grown in five different media: Colilert ® -18, glucose broth, M9-medium, tryptophan broth, and tryptic soy broth. After incubation in the different media, headspace containing the volatile compounds were analyzed by the GC-DMS and the results were validated by Gas Chromatography -Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Results showed that the… Show more
“… The Scheme for the identification of E. coli in water using GC‐DMS. Reprinted from 2015 Elsevier [38] …”
Section: Emerging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The -D-galactosidase enzyme in coliform bacteria hydrolyzes ONPG in the existence of ONPG substrate, creating o-nitrophenol. [38] The visible or absence of coliform (especially E. coli) can be established in a conventional way employing Colilert®-18 after 18 h of culture by the visible or absence of yellowish colour of o-nitrophenol. The existence or lack of brilliant blue fluorescence results can be exploited to validate the occurrence of E. coli.…”
Section: Emerging Techniques 41 Gas Chromatography-differential Mobil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An o‐nitrophenyl‐D‐galactopyranoside (ONPG) substrate is included in a Colilert®‐18 condition. The ‐D‐galactosidase enzyme in coliform bacteria hydrolyzes ONPG in the existence of ONPG substrate, creating o‐nitrophenol [38] . The visible or absence of coliform (especially E. coli ) can be established in a conventional way employing Colilert®‐18 after 18 h of culture by the visible or absence of yellowish colour of o‐nitrophenol.…”
Escherichia coli is a harmful pathogenic bacterial species causing serious intestinal sickness in humans. This bacterium has been linked to contaminated epidemics that have led to significant mortality and morbidity across the world. E. coli, like most other waterborne infections, is tricky to discover effectively in the water supply. Therefore, there is a demand for advanced E. coli detection methods that can sensitively and rapidly detect these pathogens. This review reveals several approaches used for the detection of E. coli bacteria using conventional methods such as multiple tube fermentation and membrane filtration techniques. The emerging approaches give quite accurate and speedy identification despite the necessity for culturing; nevertheless, they lack precision and necessitate extra lab testing. Because analytical techniques such as GC‐DMS lack specificity, the invention of a sensing device that is simple to use, compact, extremely sensitive, and specific has proven essential in identifying incredibly low concentrations of harmful E. coli in drinking water.
“… The Scheme for the identification of E. coli in water using GC‐DMS. Reprinted from 2015 Elsevier [38] …”
Section: Emerging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The -D-galactosidase enzyme in coliform bacteria hydrolyzes ONPG in the existence of ONPG substrate, creating o-nitrophenol. [38] The visible or absence of coliform (especially E. coli) can be established in a conventional way employing Colilert®-18 after 18 h of culture by the visible or absence of yellowish colour of o-nitrophenol. The existence or lack of brilliant blue fluorescence results can be exploited to validate the occurrence of E. coli.…”
Section: Emerging Techniques 41 Gas Chromatography-differential Mobil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An o‐nitrophenyl‐D‐galactopyranoside (ONPG) substrate is included in a Colilert®‐18 condition. The ‐D‐galactosidase enzyme in coliform bacteria hydrolyzes ONPG in the existence of ONPG substrate, creating o‐nitrophenol [38] . The visible or absence of coliform (especially E. coli ) can be established in a conventional way employing Colilert®‐18 after 18 h of culture by the visible or absence of yellowish colour of o‐nitrophenol.…”
Escherichia coli is a harmful pathogenic bacterial species causing serious intestinal sickness in humans. This bacterium has been linked to contaminated epidemics that have led to significant mortality and morbidity across the world. E. coli, like most other waterborne infections, is tricky to discover effectively in the water supply. Therefore, there is a demand for advanced E. coli detection methods that can sensitively and rapidly detect these pathogens. This review reveals several approaches used for the detection of E. coli bacteria using conventional methods such as multiple tube fermentation and membrane filtration techniques. The emerging approaches give quite accurate and speedy identification despite the necessity for culturing; nevertheless, they lack precision and necessitate extra lab testing. Because analytical techniques such as GC‐DMS lack specificity, the invention of a sensing device that is simple to use, compact, extremely sensitive, and specific has proven essential in identifying incredibly low concentrations of harmful E. coli in drinking water.
“…These methods exhibit high specificity and require low volumes of samples; however, complex pre-steps for sample preparation are involved, and highly qualified and skilled individuals must operate the equipment. The strategies for bacterial detection applied in the case of PCR require the extraction of bacterial DNA and the use of a thermocycler, which is unsuitable for on-field testing [34,35].…”
Contamination of surface waters with pathogens as well as all diseases associated with such events are a significant concern worldwide. In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in developing analytical methods with good performance for the detection of this category of contaminants. The most important analytical methods applied for the determination of bacteria in waters are traditional ones (such as bacterial culturing methods, enzyme-linked immunoassay, polymerase chain reaction, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification) and advanced alternative methods (such as spectrometry, chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, and magnetic field-assisted and hyphenated techniques). In addition, optical and electrochemical sensors have gained much attention as essential alternatives for the conventional detection of bacteria. The large number of available methods have been materialized by many publications in this field aimed to ensure the control of water quality in water resources. This study represents a critical synthesis of the literature regarding the latest analytical methods covering comparative aspects of pathogen contamination of water resources. All these aspects are presented as representative examples, focusing on two important bacteria with essential implications on the health of the population, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.
“…In addition to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional culture-based assays [8][9][10] , common pathogen detection methods include biochemical techniques 11 , instrumental-based approaches, such as flow cytometry and gas chromatography 12,13 , as well as spectroscopy-based techniques, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy 14,15 . Despite being accurate, robust and sensitive down to the single-cell level 16 , these techniques are costly and time-consuming (hours to days), requiring centralized laboratories, trained personnel, sample pre-treatment and multi-step processing.…”
The detection of pathogenic bacteria is essential to prevent and treat infections and to provide food security. Current gold-standard detection techniques, such as culture-based assays and polymerase chain reaction, are time-consuming and require centralized laboratories. Therefore, efforts have focused on developing point-of-care devices that are fast, cheap, portable and do not require specialized training. Paper-based analytical devices meet these criteria and are particularly suitable to deployment in low-resource settings. In this Review, we highlight paper-based analytical devices with substantial point-of-care applicability for bacteria detection and discuss challenges and opportunities for future development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.