2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas and dust from solar metallicity AGB stars

Abstract: We study the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) evolution of stars with masses between 1 M − 8.5 M . We focus on stars with a solar chemical composition, which allows us to interpret evolved stars in the Galaxy. We present a detailed comparison with models of the same chemistry, calculated with a different evolution code and based on a different set of physical assumptions. We find that stars of mass ≥ 3.5 M experience hot bottom burning at the base of the envelope. They have AGB lifetimes shorter than ∼ 3 × 10 5 y… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
118
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
11
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include comparisons between the number of thermal pulses produced for various masses and comparison of the conditions under which the 3DU occurred (Karakas & Lattanzio 2007). Our models were broadly consistent with the literature on both accounts, producing, e.g., roughly 20-25 thermal pulses before shell exhaustion for a star with initial mass 2.0 M (Ventura et al 2018;Pignatari et al 2016;Choi et al 2016;Cristallo et al 2015;Tashibu et al 2017;Karakas & Lattanzio 2007;Blöcker 1995;Trabucchi et al 2019).…”
Section: Model Grid Designsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These include comparisons between the number of thermal pulses produced for various masses and comparison of the conditions under which the 3DU occurred (Karakas & Lattanzio 2007). Our models were broadly consistent with the literature on both accounts, producing, e.g., roughly 20-25 thermal pulses before shell exhaustion for a star with initial mass 2.0 M (Ventura et al 2018;Pignatari et al 2016;Choi et al 2016;Cristallo et al 2015;Tashibu et al 2017;Karakas & Lattanzio 2007;Blöcker 1995;Trabucchi et al 2019).…”
Section: Model Grid Designsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For Pop II/I core-collapse SNe we use the yields from Bianchi & Schneider (2007) (based on the supernova models by Woosley & Weaver 1995), while for AGB stars we adopt the yields from Ferrarotti & Gail (2006a) and Zhukovska et al (2008a) (derived from the models of van den Hoek & Groenewegen 1997). However, alternative sets of consistent metal and dust yields could be adopted in future works to explore the impact of more recent calculations of core-collapse SNe (Marassi et al 2019) and AGB dust yields (Ventura et al 2012b,a;Di Criscienzo et al 2013;Dell'Agli et al 2017;Ventura et al 2018;Dell'Agli et al 2019).…”
Section: Dust Production By Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reaction is responsible for the anticorrelation of oxygen and sodium abundances observed in globular clusters [7,8] and its rate affects models seeking to reproduce this anticorrelation; see Ref. [9] for a recent example.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be further consequences of the new rate on sodium production in carbon-enhanced metal poor stars, depending on the scenario of hydrogen burning [45]. Overall, the new precise nuclear physics input will be instrumental in future studies of stellar scenarios [3,9,42,43,46,47] addressing hot-bottom burning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%