2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Garnet oxygen analysis by SHRIMP-SI: Matrix corrections and application to high-pressure metasomatic rocks from Alpine Corsica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raimondo et al (2012) similarly reported ion microprobe analyses of garnets in amphibolite facies rocks that are either homogeneous in d 18 O within error of measurement or exhibit significant intracrystalline variations of no more than $0.5&. Larger intracrystalline variations in d 18 O of up to 9-10& in garnet from regional metamorphic rocks documented by other ion microprobe studies (Martin et al, 2011(Martin et al, , 2014Page et al, 2014) appear to be exceptional.…”
Section: Regional Metamorphic Rocksmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raimondo et al (2012) similarly reported ion microprobe analyses of garnets in amphibolite facies rocks that are either homogeneous in d 18 O within error of measurement or exhibit significant intracrystalline variations of no more than $0.5&. Larger intracrystalline variations in d 18 O of up to 9-10& in garnet from regional metamorphic rocks documented by other ion microprobe studies (Martin et al, 2011(Martin et al, , 2014Page et al, 2014) appear to be exceptional.…”
Section: Regional Metamorphic Rocksmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…12 consistent with the calibration of Valley et al, 2003), by systematic oxygen isotope exchange disequilibrium between garnet and most other minerals in the samples, or by some combination of these factors. Modification of d 18 O of garnet following initial crystallization seems an unlikely explanation both because oxygen diffusion in garnet is probably very slow (Martin et al, 2011(Martin et al, , 2014Page et al, 2014) and because garnet typically exhibits no textural evidence for recrystallization after it formed (e.g., Fig. 6).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Fractionations On A-d Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During our analysis, standard UWG‐2 garnet gave δ 18 O ratios of 5.8 ± 0.3 (2σ, n = 15), consistent with the recommended value within the analytical errors (δ 18 O = 5.8 ‰, Valley et al, ). Errors on the individual oxygen analyses are given at 2σ, which include the error on the reproducibility of the standard in the same session and that of the matrix correction (±0.25‰, 1σ, Martin et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Martin et al . , Rubatto et al . ) because of the lack of adequate theoretical models able to accurately predict secondary ion yields or isotope ratios during sputtering processes (Śliwiński et al .…”
Section: Oxygen Isotopes In Serpentine Reference Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIMS oxygen isotope analyses are also subject to a large matrix bias related to differences in the chemical composition (i.e., cations) of some minerals or glasses (e.g., Eiler et al 1997, Page et al 2010. This has been observed, for instance, in garnet (e.g., Vielzeuf et al 2005, Page et al 2010, Martin et al 2014, monazite (e.g., Rubatto et al 2014), titanite (e.g., Bonamici et al 2011) and carbonates (e.g., Eiler et al 1997, Rollion-Bard and Marin-Carbonne 2011, Sliwi nski et al 2016. Therefore, reference materials should usually be the same mineral phase as the sample and have a similar chemical composition.…”
Section: Matrix Bias In Ion Microprobe Serpentine Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%