Gaps and Plugs: TNO, and the Problems of Getting Knowledge out of Laboratories

Rooij, Arjan van

doi:10.1007/s11024-013-9217-y

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The 'gap' between science and policy, seen as the inevitable consequence of the fact that both represent different cultures or even worlds, has been extensively studied, debated and criticised in the field of science and policy studies (Wehrens et al, 2011;van der Arend, 2014;Wellstead et al, 2018;Mols et al, 2020). Historians have deconstructed how the spatial metaphor of a 'gap' highlights and/or constitutes alienation, separation and distance between (the practices and networks of) scientific research and 'others', like policy, but also industry and the public (Bensaude-Vincent, 2001;van Rooij, 2013). More in general there is a wide-shared understanding that the use of evidence in policymaking, and the relation between scientific research and political decision making, is not self-evident, potentially problematic and has its own politics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Productive interactions in a port city: a proximity approach to coordination in science-policy collaborations

Smit,

Westerduin,

van Buuren

2024

Evidence &Amp; Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Many different concepts have been invoked in the literature to describe coordination between scientific and policy practices. However, a framework to understand different types of this boundary management is lacking, which allows ‘linear’ models and ‘gap’ metaphors to persist. Objectives:To operationalise the multidimensional ‘proximity’ approach from innovation studies in the context of coordination work between science and policy and employ it in a case study of hybrid research spaces in the port city of Rotterdam. Method:Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with scientists, policymakers and policy researchers involved in collaborative knowledge labs. Findings:Different proximity dimensions can both stimulate and impede productive interactions in collaborations between science and policy actors. There is no uniform mechanism to overcome coordination problems and different knowledge labs use different combinations of proximities. Discussion and conclusions:We conclude that the concepts of cognitive, social, organisational and geographic proximity enable a fine-grained articulation of the balancing act required for successful and enduring collaborative knowledge work between scientists and policymakers. The operationalisation of proximity for structured science-policy interactions led us to the insight that an analytical distinction can be made between ordering and operating enactments of proximity. Ultimately, we interpret this as two types of politics of knowledge production, and call on policymakers, researchers, and other involved parties to take this into consideration when organising structural knowledge collaborations between research and policy practices.

show abstract