2021
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GapAnalysis: an R package to calculate conservation indicators using spatial information

Abstract: Effective assessments of the current status of biodiversity conservation are needed to support planning, policy and action, from local to global levels. Of particular use would be well documented, reproducible methods based on openly accessible data and tools. Such methods should provide an accurate estimate of the state of conservation of diversity, identifying gaps in current conservation systems, while providing a benchmark against which to measure success, including determining when conservation goals have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obvious next steps for our priority species would be in-depth approaches like gap analysis (Sowa et al, 2007; Carver et al, 2021), connectivity analysis (Fajardo et al, 2014), or ecological modeling (Rodríguez et al, 2007), to name just a few. We hope to provide a basis for identifying and pursuing such studies, as our methods could be applied to many other groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obvious next steps for our priority species would be in-depth approaches like gap analysis (Sowa et al, 2007; Carver et al, 2021), connectivity analysis (Fajardo et al, 2014), or ecological modeling (Rodríguez et al, 2007), to name just a few. We hope to provide a basis for identifying and pursuing such studies, as our methods could be applied to many other groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those species finally classified as threatened (VU, EN, or CR) after our full Criterion B evaluation as well as those previously evaluated, we performed a final analysis using an geographic-ecological approach to evaluate their conservation gaps and suggest prioritized initiatives depending on the species’ threat status and its representation in conservation strategies. Towards this goal, we employed the Carver et al (2021) method (package GapAnalysis ), which relies on existing conservation practices targeting the species of interest and calculate nine metrics recommended by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and calculating conservation representativeness in both ex-situ and in-situ initiatives (CBD, 2020; Hoban et al, 2020; Khoury et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 513 seed accessions of 53 taxa and 2079 occurrence records were used in the gap analysis and conservation prioritization (excluding accessions not defined to species level); of which 274 seed accessions of 26 taxa had unique coordinates and SDMs (used to calculate GRSex and ERSex). For these analyses, we used the Gap Analysis R package (Carver et al, 2021 ). To map where maximum numbers of different species could be sampled for future collection to increase GRSex and ERSex, we overlaid SDMs minus 50 km buffers of existing collecting locations and summed the number of species modelled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these analyses, we used the Gap Analysis R package (Carver et al, 2021). To map where maximum numbers of different species could be sampled for future collection to increase GRSex and ERSex, we overlaid SDMs minus 50 km buffers of existing collecting locations and summed the number of species modelled.…”
Section: Gap Analysis and Conservation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%