2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep38217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics

Abstract: This study proposed a novel methodology to classify the shape of gaps using landscape indices and multivariate statistics. Patch-level indices were used to collect the qualified shape and spatial configuration characteristics for canopy gaps in the Lienhuachih Experimental Forest in Taiwan in 1998 and 2002. Non-hierarchical cluster analysis was used to assess the optimal number of gap clusters and canonical discriminant analysis was used to generate the discriminant functions for canopy gap classification. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maps of gaps were manually sketched with visual interpretation to create shape files as accurately as possible using ArcGIS 10.6 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA); vector data were subsequently converted to raster data ( Figure 2). Landscape indices have been proven to accurately quantify gap characteristics in previous studies [25,28]. Three widely used indices were selected to quantify the gap size, shape, and spatial distribution.…”
Section: Gap Characteristics Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps of gaps were manually sketched with visual interpretation to create shape files as accurately as possible using ArcGIS 10.6 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA); vector data were subsequently converted to raster data ( Figure 2). Landscape indices have been proven to accurately quantify gap characteristics in previous studies [25,28]. Three widely used indices were selected to quantify the gap size, shape, and spatial distribution.…”
Section: Gap Characteristics Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaps can range from small openings formed from the death of a single tree, medium openings formed by the asynchronous mortality of multiple trees, to large opening related to periodic storm events [10]. Gaps, in addition to being different for size, differ also in severity and frequency [8,11] and can trigger dynamic processes of forest species settlement, which causing change in composition, structure, and age [15][16][17], creating heterogeneity in forests [18,19]. Apart from the gap sizes, the cardinal points inside of gaps also influence the microclimatic conditions [20,21] and consequent germination and growth of tree species, playing a crucial role in the distribution of the vegetation patterns [9,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape indices have been proven to accurately quantify gap characteristics in previous studies (Getzin et al 2012;Wu et al 2016). Three widely used indices were selected to quantify the gap size, shape, and spatial distribution.…”
Section: Gap Characteristics Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%