Using high resolution angle-resolved photoemission data in conjunction with that from neutron and other probes, we show that electron-phonon (el-ph) coupling is strong in cuprates superconductors and it plays an important role in pairing. In addition to the strong electron correlation, the inclusion of phonons provides a theoretical framework explaining many important phenomena that cannot be understood by a strongly correlated electronic model alone. Especially it is indispensable to explain the difference among materials. The phonons with the wave number around the (0, qx) and (qx, 0) axes create the d-wave pairing while that near (π, π) are pair breaking. Therefore the half-breathing mode of the oxygen motions helps d-wave superconductivity.PACS numbers: 79.60. Bm, 73.20.Dx, It has been a long-standing question whether a strongly correlated electronic model of the CuO 2 plane, such as the t-J or Hubbard model alone, can explain the essential experimental observation of superconductivity in cuprates oxides. On the one hand, such a model has been remarkably successful in explaining many important physical properties, most notably the property of the undoped insulator and the renormalization of charge dynamics in it, by spin dynamics from t to J scale 1,2 and in predicting a spin gap 3-5 . On the other hand, important questions have been raised. The first is the observation that, while the CuO 2 plane conductivity is essentially the same for various families of cuprates, their T c vary by at least an order of magnitude 6,7 . The second is the observation that the phonons and lattice effects are clearly present in these materials 8 , following the original assumption that the Jahn-Teller (JT) polarons might be important for superconductivity 9 . There is currently no consensus on the above issues.Within the context of cuprates superconductors, it is difficult to understand some of the material specific properties by considering only the electronic degree of freedom. Fig. 1a summarizes the systematic in the superconducting gap size (∆), together with the transition temperature (T c ) shown in Fig. 1c. Unlike T c , which can be depressed by phase fluctuations in the underdoped regime 10-12 , the superconducting gap essentially reflects the pairing strength. It can be clearly seen that the pairing strength for the p-type cuprates is very strong, with gap sizes that are at least an order of magnitude larger than conventional superconductors. Further, the maximum T c of each family is controlled by the maximum superconducting gap size. This is most dramatically illustrated by the HgBa 2 Ca n−1 Cu n O 2(n+1) (Hg1223 for n=3) compound, which has a much larger gap size as well as T c . Fig 1a also clearly shows a discrepancy between pand n-type materials, as superconductivity in a n-type material appears to be very fragile with a much weaker pairing strength. The electron-hole asymmetry is particularly perplexing in the context of spin pairing only, as magnetism is very strong and persists to a much wider range in the n-...