2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.3038013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GANMcC: A Generative Adversarial Network With Multiclassification Constraints for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to verify the effectiveness of our FusionADA, we show some intuitive results from our work with 7 other state-of-the-art infrared and visible fusion methods, containing gradient transfer fusion (GTF) [ 24 ], fourth-order partial differential equations (FPDE) [ 25 ], hybrid multi-scale decomposition (HMSD) [ 26 ], DenseFuse [ 19 ], proportional maintenance of gradient and intensity (PMGI) [ 27 ], unified unsupervised image fusion (U2Fusion) [ 28 ], and generative adversarial network with multi-classification constraints (GANMcC) [ 29 ]. Among them, GTF, FPDE and HMSD are fusion methods based on the traditional framework, while DenseFuse, PMGI, U2Fusion and GANMcC are deep learning-based fusion methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the effectiveness of our FusionADA, we show some intuitive results from our work with 7 other state-of-the-art infrared and visible fusion methods, containing gradient transfer fusion (GTF) [ 24 ], fourth-order partial differential equations (FPDE) [ 25 ], hybrid multi-scale decomposition (HMSD) [ 26 ], DenseFuse [ 19 ], proportional maintenance of gradient and intensity (PMGI) [ 27 ], unified unsupervised image fusion (U2Fusion) [ 28 ], and generative adversarial network with multi-classification constraints (GANMcC) [ 29 ]. Among them, GTF, FPDE and HMSD are fusion methods based on the traditional framework, while DenseFuse, PMGI, U2Fusion and GANMcC are deep learning-based fusion methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is based on the PyTorch framework and runs on a NVIDIA GTX1070 GPU. We evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of our scheme by comparing with a number of recent CNN-based methods (i.e., PMGI [50], FGAN [37], DDcGAN [36], FusionDN [46], U2Fusion [45], RFN [19], GANMcC [38], Nest [16], DID [51] and Dense [15]).…”
Section: Training Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Walds protocol [55] can not be applied to infrared-visible image fusion, so that there is no resolution degradation step for all infrared-visible image fusion. In many cases, both original visible and infrared images are used as supervising information such as [110]. How to provide supervising information sometimes depends on the application scenarios of the fusion.…”
Section: Infrared-visible Image Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%