Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ccgrid.2006.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gang scheduling and adaptive resource allocation to mitigate advance reservation impact

Abstract: Simultaneous parallel computational grid jobs require reservation by the local job schedulers to ensure allocation of matching time slots at the different sites involved. However, reservations create road blocks in the local schedule, leading to only a small percentage of reservations being tolerable. A large number of reservations typically has adverse effects on local response times and machine utilization. We have extended our SCOJO scheduler to enable advance reservations. SCOJO can perform space sharing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of these strategies include static [18] or dynamic [47] gang-scheduling using advance reservation [38] and middleware mechanisms favouring simultaneous allocation such as the EGEE DAG job type. Grid advance reservation suffer from two drawbacks: first, planning is not consistent with the goal of seamless integration with everyday computing practice, for instance the use cases described in Section 2; second, reservation is inherently not work-conserving, meaning that processors might idle while eligible jobs are queued [46].…”
Section: Virtual Reservationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these strategies include static [18] or dynamic [47] gang-scheduling using advance reservation [38] and middleware mechanisms favouring simultaneous allocation such as the EGEE DAG job type. Grid advance reservation suffer from two drawbacks: first, planning is not consistent with the goal of seamless integration with everyday computing practice, for instance the use cases described in Section 2; second, reservation is inherently not work-conserving, meaning that processors might idle while eligible jobs are queued [46].…”
Section: Virtual Reservationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, advance reservation can only ensure the availability of resources at required time, but cannot provide guarantees to deadline [3,15]. In addition, many studies [16][17] show that excessive advance reservation will degrade the system's performance, for instance, high rejection rate and low resource utilization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By conducting extensive simulations, Kaushik concluded that when the size of reservation window equal to the average waiting time in on-demand queue, the reservation blocking probability (rejection rate) can be minimized near to zero. In [8], Sodan et al incorporated gang scheduling and adaptive resource allocation into SCOJO scheduler [11] to mitigate the negative effects brought about by advance reservation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reservation has been proven effective in many situations, it also brings several negative effects on resources sharing and scheduling in Grid computing [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Many studies indicate that conventional reservation will result in low resource utilization, and excessive reservation can lead to high rejection rate of requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%