2008
DOI: 10.1080/07418820802024911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gang Membership, Gun Carrying, and Employment: Applying Routine Activities Theory to Explain Violent Victimization Among Inner City, Minority Youth Living in Extreme Poverty∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review of this literature, Fox (2013Fox ( : 1035 argued that the ''analysis of the gang-victimization link should include examinations of longitudinal data and controls for delinquency/ crime.'' Longitudinal studies, alternatively, have focused on the contemporaneous and prospective direct effects of gang membership on victimization (Barnes et al 2012;DeLisi et al 2009;Gibson et al 2009;Ousey et al 2011;Ozer and Engel 2011;Spano et al 2008;Sweeten et al 2013), leaving the specific mechanisms that bring about this relationship unresolved, which Fox (2013Fox ( : 1016 identified as a key direction in her commentary on the literature.…”
Section: Advancing Knowledge On the Gang Membership-victimization Linkmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent review of this literature, Fox (2013Fox ( : 1035 argued that the ''analysis of the gang-victimization link should include examinations of longitudinal data and controls for delinquency/ crime.'' Longitudinal studies, alternatively, have focused on the contemporaneous and prospective direct effects of gang membership on victimization (Barnes et al 2012;DeLisi et al 2009;Gibson et al 2009;Ousey et al 2011;Ozer and Engel 2011;Spano et al 2008;Sweeten et al 2013), leaving the specific mechanisms that bring about this relationship unresolved, which Fox (2013Fox ( : 1016 identified as a key direction in her commentary on the literature.…”
Section: Advancing Knowledge On the Gang Membership-victimization Linkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A growing list of empirical studies have established a link between gang membership and violent victimization (Barnes et al 2012;Childs et al 2009;Decker and Pyrooz 2010;DeLisi et al 2009;Fox et al 2013;Gibson et al 2009;Gover et al 2009;Katz et al 2011;Ozer and Engel 2011;Pyrooz et al 2014;Rufino et al 2012;Sweeten et al 2013;Spano et al 2008;Taylor et al 2007Taylor et al , 2008Zavala and Spohn 2013). Drawn from wide and diverse research designs that span a range of demographic groups and sampling frames, this body of evidence is large enough that few would dispute the fact that gang members are victims of violence at a rate that is much higher than their peers who are not in gangs.…”
Section: Gang Membership and Violent Victimization In Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Spano et al (2008) used the lifestyles/routine activities theoretical perspective to examine the risk of violent victimization attributable to gang membership, gun carrying, and employment among a sample of 1,295 youth. Although the bivariate analyses indicated that gang members were significantly more likely to experience violent victimization, the effects were not significant when simultaneously controlling for demographic, family, and deviant lifestyle factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these studies use either high-risk populations Lizotte et al, 2000;Spano et al, 2011;Spano & Bolland, 2013), incarcerated populations (Sheley & Wright, 1993, 1995, all male populations (Hayes & Hemenway, 1999;Lizotte et al, 1997Lizotte et al, , 2000Luster & Oh, 2001) or use only one racial designation (Webster et al, 1993;Spano et al, 2008Spano et al, , 2011Spano & Bolland, 2013). There have been limited studies that use samples drawn from a general population.…”
Section: Gang Membership and Gun Carryingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, most studies have focused on citybased or regional samples with high-risk populations that have limited generalizability (Bjerregaard & Lizotte, 1995;Lizotte et al, 2000;Lizotte et al, 1997;Bennett & Holloway, 2004;Sheley & Wright, 1993;Spano, Freilich, & Bolland, 2008). While focusing on high-risk samples has the benefit of yielding larger samples of gang members and those who carry guns, the external validity of these studies is jeopardized since these youths may be more predisposed to carry a gun.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%