2006
DOI: 10.1086/505329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-Ray Imaging of the 2003 October/November Solar Flares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
116
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
17
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the extended source observed in interval A is still present in interval B, although at a low level, the size of the impulsive component alone should be even smaller than values given above. The source location is again near the southern ribbon but shifted by $15 00 relative to the last position of the radio source in interval A, and it roughly coincides with the flare-averaged 2.2 MeV footpoint position observed on the southern ribbon ( Hurford et al 2006). Although radio emission from the other 2.2 MeV footpoint on the northern ribbon is clearly outside the optimum imaging field of view, it is within one of the multibeams.…”
Section: Imagingsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the extended source observed in interval A is still present in interval B, although at a low level, the size of the impulsive component alone should be even smaller than values given above. The source location is again near the southern ribbon but shifted by $15 00 relative to the last position of the radio source in interval A, and it roughly coincides with the flare-averaged 2.2 MeV footpoint position observed on the southern ribbon ( Hurford et al 2006). Although radio emission from the other 2.2 MeV footpoint on the northern ribbon is clearly outside the optimum imaging field of view, it is within one of the multibeams.…”
Section: Imagingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It arises from an apparently extended source with average size of 57 00 AE 4 00 located between the ribbons, which shows a slow apparent motion of about 25 km s À1 . RHESSI hard X-ray imaging observations in the 250Y450 keV range show two hard X-ray footpoints and a fainter third source in between the footpoints ( Hurford et al 2006). This third source is unlikely a footpoint source but is rather emission from the corona (Krucker et al 2008), although projection effects do not allow us to unambiguously identify the origin of this source.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Flareintegrated RHESSI imaging results of this event are published by Hurford et al (2006) showing that the 2.2 MeV emission produced by energetic protons comes from two sources, one on each of the flare ribbons, but displaced by ∼15Љ from the 200-300 keV footpoints. Next to the two electron bremsstrahlung footpoints, a fainter third source from in between the footpoints is also observed in the 200-300 keV image (Hurford et al 2006, Fig.…”
Section: The 2003 October 28 Flarementioning
confidence: 98%
“…RHESSI imaging (Hurford et al 2002) uses nine bigrid rotating modulation collimators (RMCs). Behind each RMC is a cryogenically cooled germanium detector that provides high spectral resolution (∼1-10 keV FWHM) over the 3 keV-17 MeV energy range (Smith et al 2002).…”
Section: Observations and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation